Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (266077)	6/22/2002 11:53:43 AM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Observed? What a liar you are. I suppose Methusaleh or Gilgamesh is still around writing this?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (266077)	6/23/2002 7:45:17 AM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Yes, frequency is considered to be sporadic in evolutionary change. Gaps and inconsistencies are none the less overlooked in the theory. Smoothly wasn't the best word. Current theory does though require sizable jumps and considers it no big deal. I don't completely reject evolution, but I don't accept it as a complete explanation or fact. The creation of sub-species in evolution seems somewhat reasonable. However, the more that is expected of the process the less credible it begins to appear. * * *