Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (166879)	6/22/2002 3:29:22 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

AS A VERY PRELIMINARY OPINION I have only read a small part of the Order Denying Microsoft Motion to dismiss. (Yeah I know, but I got other things I am working on.) She from what I did read, she is SCRUPULOUS in following the mandate of the 130 page opinion based on Jackson's ruling. For instance, she did not dismiss the states, PRIMARILY, because, IN MY OPINION, she was instructed by the applellate court to contemplate their issues. SOOOO...based on my rapier like mind which is at this very moment balancing 130 variables much like a 400 way Intel parralel Big Bertha Processor guritates data.......... She will basically agree with the fed settlement with a few polishings that the states suggested, thus satisfying both the Hummer Act and the unanswered question of whether this was really a brand new trial. So ordered. This blank day of blank, Hon. Duke, J. presiding (intentionally not spellchecked)