SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric K. who wrote (166886)6/22/2002 7:10:19 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Respond to of 186894
 
These charts show a major fundamental difference in approach.

Buffet's idea of long-term is a couple of decades and he's willing to sit on something for a long time so long as the cash flows are moving in the right direction.

Most tech babies' definition is something between four and seven years. (Not coindicentally, right between the time their options fully vest, and the time they expire.)

There are a lot of people out there who I suspect will be VERY disappointed when they find out how long the "long term" really can be. In many sectors and for many people, it will turn out to be "too long."

mg



To: Eric K. who wrote (166886)6/23/2002 1:41:07 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:" I hate to encourage the whole fellate-the-buffett complex that many investors seem to have. However, he does seem to have some clue, even relative to your beloved I-N-T-C"

Although I think Intel will rise again it's rather silly for an Intel holder to diss Buffett. Essentially he's running a mutual fund and Intel is one of the greatest growth companies in history and he's still beat it.

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News