SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (143268)6/22/2002 9:21:46 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
ICG was never anything more than a weak, immature imitation of the worst conglomerates of the sixties. But they did have the midas touch for a while - if you were quick enough to sell whatever gold they created before anyone noticed it was fools gold. I was sitting in their San Francisco office in March 2000, presenting our plan to a twenty-something know-it-all who made multi-million dollar decisions, when news hit about some Hong Kong company they invested in. The stock doubled or tripled or quadrupled on the news.

Silly times, they were.

Pretty silly now, too. IMO.

Bob

PS: I laugh now whenever I think about how big a deal the "'40 act" was then.



To: GST who wrote (143268)6/23/2002 12:23:34 PM
From: H James Morris  Respond to of 164684
 
LOL! of course I do. And everyone who was on this thread during the bubble made a bundle on it.
And don't forget the other 2 incubators CMGI and SFE.
I think Happy Girl retired on CMGI, and Dr TomD bought a castle in europe with his ICGE winnings.
quote.yahoo.com