Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (266203)	6/23/2002 1:50:16 PM
From: Neeka	Respond to of 769667

There is absolutely NO argument possible against your excellent post. M

To: greenspirit who wrote (266203)	6/23/2002 2:04:20 PM
From: FastC6	Respond to of 769667

Bullseye.....you just hit flapjack and the rest of the liberal dumbshits square along side the head with a 2x4. NICE!!! . .

To: greenspirit who wrote (266203)	6/23/2002 2:08:16 PM
From: George Coyne	Respond to of 769667

Amen, Michael.

To: greenspirit who wrote (266203)	6/23/2002 11:45:58 PM
From: Mr. Whist	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Re: "Your false assumptions seem to be that everything was working fine until vouchers came along, and vouchers have now screwed up a perfectly running system." Wrong again. I have never once stated that "everything was working fine." Let me state my position for the 19th time. This time listen for a change: Public education needs help. In some places, it needs major help. If you want to discuss drastic, revolutionary, out-of-the-box solutions, fine. I'll listen. If you want to reinvent the public education wheel, fine. I'll listen. Just don't tell me that vouchers are going to change the big picture. They're not. They're nothing more than a Republican "feel-good" band-aid to a major problem. Voters in two major states (Michigan and California) overwhelmingly stated at the polls in November '00 that they don't want vouchers. Use the money instead to improve the schools, they said. What part of "no" don't you understand? What part of 70 yes and 30 no don't you understand? Re: "Another inner city teenager graduates without learning to read his diploma." The high school dropout rate at many inner-city schools now stands at 75 percent. I suspect for those that do graduate, they need no help reading their diplomas.