Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Coyne who wrote (266226)	6/23/2002 2:39:46 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 769667

Re: What on earth are you implying here? The speculation is that the Pentagon attacked itself because so much was at stake. The War Rackets budget was $280 Billion/yr. a couple years ago. Now it is ONE HUNDRED BILLION MORE. Which is, to put things in perspective, more than the next two belligerent nations combined spend of war and murder rackets. That so-called "attack" on the Pentagon was very good for business. As always, it is important to relentless ask cui bono? -Ray

To: George Coyne who wrote (266226)	6/23/2002 11:26:01 PM
From: MSI	Respond to of 769667

Whether it was accidental or intentional, the flight path took a contortion to hit what happened to be the most empty portion, undergoing renovation. It would have been much easier to hit another part of the building. What does that imply? Who knows. The important thing are the facts, not the conclusions at this point. Unfortunately, facts will be gathered in any case, against the wishes of the administration, who is blocking attempts, destroying surveillance data, and basically running like a thief in the night.