Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pete who wrote (312)	6/24/2002 11:39:56 AM
From: Anchan	Respond to of 5423

Dig it, friends. Gold to shine, right on. Strange, still: Yahoo quotes Stealth Minerals (SML) , for example, as having last traded on the U.S. pink sheets (OTC) on June 12, i.e. 12 days ago. And this, while on this very public SI forum, Stealth seems to have considerable support. Does this mean that, whatever support Stealth may have on the Canadian exchange, the U.S. pink sheet (=OTC) volumes are just too tiny, i.e. the US-traded stock too illiquid to be attractive? At the same time, volume of Northgate (NGX) on the Toronto exchange is 15 times bigger than on the pink sheets today. Beginner's conclusion: the U.S. (=OTC traded) volumes of Canadian miners are too tiny, too illiquid, to justify my ladling out the good coin. Tell me why I am wrong.