Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DebtBomb who wrote (84141)	6/24/2002 1:56:43 PM
From: 16yearcycle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

zactly

To: DebtBomb who wrote (84141)	6/24/2002 1:57:10 PM
From: Softechie	Respond to of 99280

I'm still waiting for 1100...this pump will dump soon...

To: DebtBomb who wrote (84141)	6/24/2002 3:04:16 PM
From: augieboo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Dale, I see your point, but I'm not sure that you understood Cashin's point. (I saw the same piece with him as you did, I think, but I came away with a very different take on it.) On the other hand, maybe you understood him and I did not. So, let me tell you how I saw it, and tell me what you think. It seemed to me he was saying that IF the Nas retests the Sept intra-day low, AND the DOW and S&P go along, we COULD get a capitulation-type event today, which would allow us to put in a bottom for at least the summer. But, I don't think he meant that if we come close to the Sept intraday low, then we'll just hit that low a day or two later, hence the bottom is, for all intents and purpose, "IN." He seemed (to me) to be saying that if we DON'T get to such a capitulative event, this slow grinding will simply continue. The implication I took away from what he said is that if we don't get a capitulative event soon, the ultimate "bottom" may be quite a bit lower, and quite a bit later.