Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (266479)	6/24/2002 4:11:12 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

poor goa, every time you state again what you stated you just expose the stupidity of what you stated. Calling stupid thinkgin stupid is not an insult. Calling dishonest dodging and weaving dishonest is just telling it like it is. I've asked several questions and you cannot even explain a comma. I understood exactly what you said and explained to you the stupidity of it. And I see you don't have the ability to explain a simple comma and you also make allegation that I made statements that I did not. And your statement that if one admits that human made errors happened that there is an increase in the probability of conspiracy is idiotic. To state that acknowledging that errors documented and obvious to all is "covering their ass" is also idiotic. It to me is an indication of what I've called vacant liberal minded lefty loonism. What I have concluded and demonstrated is that you have consistently expressed opinions that proffer corruption of individuals with stupid analysis of the information available. As an American I donot believe people are corrupt or dishonest until they prove it to me by acts, deeds or words. I consider your posts dishonest and full of idiotic proffers. Comma, No I guess I don't so give us your example and explain what it means. You called me a liar. You made several proffers about my state of mind. All stupid proffers. So now it's the English Grammar defense. OK explain it. In review. gao, you now call me a liar, you state "I never said taht FIFA admitted that there was a conspiracy. " are you in a hole and playing dishonest word games. are you are going to vulgar anus land. I'm surprised. Reading comprehension, Or maybe you have a severe logic comprehension problem. I see this issue is important because it is about honesty and integrity and reporting and speaking truthfully. #reply-17643948 " you need to face reality, here. FIFA admits to gross mistakes, and the likelihood that the outcome of many matches was predetermined, just like the Olympics, is significant. " Well we know that FIFA did not admit anything but that humans had made errors and goa had proffered the rests. What did I say. I see you are not going to post a link to the article and my proffer thru inference that FIFA did not admit or suggest that any games had outcomes predetermined. I have been straightforward and honest in my discussion of the issues. All my statements to your stupidity go to your presentation of proffers and shoddy dumb logic. Show me in the article where FIFA "admits to gross mistakes, and the likelihood that the outcome of many matches was predetermined, " #reply-17641645 So it would seem you have a serious reading comprehension problem or are just plain stupid in your proffers. #reply-17643830 It's not a game when the outcome is predetermined by a handful of corrupt socialist politicians who think they know what is best for the world. It is a terrible travesty. Who are corrupt socialist politicians who predetermine the outcome??? On this thread we have vacant liberal minded lefty loons who make emotional responses or allegations. In this world cup your article..... "Some of the emotional responses from both Italy and Spain included allegations that games against the co-hosting South Korean team had been fixed." And in your article ..... "Conspiracy theories crop up in all walks of life and in 99 percent of cases they are unfounded. This one is one of the 99 percent." Gee one percent of the time events play in such a was that an unfounded allegation cannot be proven unfounded. Only an idiot take this to the conclusion that the allegation is proven. Your statements and mis statements proffered corruption existed, had occured. This is why I called you an idiot. or stupid. In review. You are quite stupid if you proffer on my understanding of the game I know and you do not. It's quite simple, show me some facts some data that builds a reasonable case. I've viewed several games of the cup and I know you or anyone cannot build a case. You actually think you make some point by making a comparison between an individual sport like Ice Skating where only judges opinions make the decision and a game of 90 minutes where 11 players are beat for a goal to be scored. And now you reach for Linux... LOL Linux is just another area I know and you demonstrate you are are ignorant. Show me a systematic analysis of the hundreds, thousands of calls made or ommitted that show for any of the World cup games that favored one team or the other. Taking single or a couple of data points out of the context of thousands and foaming at the mouth is making really stupid proffers. You seemed to have embraced the smear logic and methods of the vacant liberal minded lefty loons that post here. So I see you cannot address this.. In soccer only one bad call can decide a game. But to predetermine a game the calls would have to be very one sided. I have not seen that in any of the games I've watched. I've seen bad calls detected on replay in almost every game. None absolutely decided the game. The refs are fallible and watching 11 vs 11 with charges, tackles and in a heartbeat changes or possession not seeing everything is a real possibility. I would also expect the errors to occur toward the end of the game. This is because the ref has also been running for 70,80 ... minutes. With fatigue errors of attention and judgement will increase. This is not a conspiracy, it's just the nature of sports and being human. Something you seem to have little knowledge of. tom watson tosiwme