Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (84463)	6/24/2002 6:45:30 PM
From: furrfu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

What makes you think Johnson has a pair of skates and a stick? Doug

To: Earlie who wrote (84463)	6/24/2002 6:46:39 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

<<Let's encourage Mark to post his trades,..... including timing in and out as well as reasons for same.>> I'm ready....start tomorrow....... I've a proven better record that Zeev already.....Lets Go.....

To: Earlie who wrote (84463)	6/24/2002 6:47:53 PM
From: redwood	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

sorry earlie....that is not a better idea....it is exactly why he has to be banned.....you are talking to him again an encouraging him ...to do something he will never do but you an everyone else's responses to him is what keeps johnson going in his negative ways.....CAN'T YOU SEE HE IS UNREASONABLE

To: Earlie who wrote (84463)	6/24/2002 7:00:41 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

Ealie, Steve made him that offer a number of times, and then he actually made a promise that if my call that by Memorial day we get above 1700 he'll leave, he did not. Enough is enough, someone just PM'd me few days back when Johnson was active "doctoring the record" and ask that I respond to a claim that I suggested playing MRK at $65 or something like that, long after MRK was discarded from the core to the fallen angels category with a target of $43 or so, he simply lies, the type of "white lies", taking posts with the "buy" recommendation, without the later "sell" suggestion. He lost a lot of money by following a suggestion early in 2000 that VLNC's momentum was such that it could reach $65 (mind you, he was not following my suggestion, but Wollenchuk's, he must have been paying for the latter's advice, so he could not blame him, mine was free, but that is another story), he is still waiting for $65, despite the fact that both "soft" and very hard stop losses were breached and brought to everyone's attention (that is everyone that knows how to read). It just take too much of my time responding to PM's related to him and reading responses to him. I am not willing to waste my time on him. We all make mistakes, and it is fine when these mistakes are pointed out, as drstrong pointed today, but that is not what Johnson is doing, he is a stalker, and we can do without. Zeev