Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.T. who wrote (13003)	6/25/2002 9:52:48 AM
From: Steve Lee	Respond to of 19219

I don't see how Mark Johnson being banned from Zeev's Turnips thread is anything to do with first amendment. He has the right to voice his opinion and he can start a thread to do so. The difference is there will be no audience. Zeev's thread may have my name at the top but it is only popular because Zeev posts there and has an excellent track record and is generous enough to share his extensive and impressive knowledge. It is in defference to such generosity that I run the thread the way he would like it to be run. I have even listed his favorite charity at the top of that thread. The charity is a Hebrew charity and I am non-religious. In fact I would not personally contribute to any charity that promotes any sort of religion because I think religion in general is harmful to people's quality of life. But I believe the most important person on that thread is Zeev so what he says goes. As to wanting my bio you can want all you like but you ain't getting it. Too many nutters on the internet to share personal details. There is only one thing that matters when it comes to investments - results. I don't care if you post your trades or not - I won't follow them. I don't need to argue who has made the most money because the real prize comes in the account balance, not who on SI believes makes good trades. I list trades here for feedback and discussion. I welcome creative argument. Yours is argumentative argument.