Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Soccer World Cup MLS Euro Champions League etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vds4 who wrote (2064)	6/25/2002 11:35:22 AM
From: X Y Zebra	Respond to of 5130

Well... true. That's the other viable option. Just accept the risk of human error as part of the obstacle (for the benefit of the flow of the game), and shut up about it. I mean, yes it is the World Cup (or UEFA or whatever)... but it still a game... not that borders will change as a result of the defeat, or pillage will follow from the wining nation upon the losing one... -g [give me all your virgins you losers ! -lol]

To: vds4 who wrote (2064)	6/25/2002 12:15:49 PM
From: Jon Khymn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5130

i would imagine given the complexities encountered in tennis computerizing the line judges, I thought about that, too. Why not use electrical sensor on the line? There would be NO but, and ifs... Also I think it is possible to determine the "strike zone" in baseball. a sensor between chest and knee and 4 corners of the home plate will create a strike zone. But the big question is - accuracy always better for the game? Will it be more FUN to watch the game if a machine or computer is making the calls?