Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (4600)	6/25/2002 1:18:12 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

You must be kidding. The way it works: First the press finds you guilty of doing what will win favor for those reporting you. Second, you're sentenced by the media. Third, the society takes away all your money because it finds a scapegoat for its own failures.

To: GraceZ who wrote (4600)	6/25/2002 5:49:58 PM
From: ayahuasca	Respond to of 24758

theoretically, but not in practice. My inclination, based on experience, is to believe she did what she is being accused of. But again, I dont know much about this specific case, and without access to all the information, my opinion about Martha is only that. I am perfectly willing to be wrong, but not about the premise that she should be investigated and pursued to the full extent of the law, however that turns out. I just happen to be a jaded cynic, especially when it comes to the absurdly wealthy and powerful.