SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (53185)6/25/2002 7:10:29 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
19:08 ET Adelphia files for bankruptcy (ADLAE) : The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Adelphia has filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and has obtained $1.5 bln in debtor-in-possession financing; the bankruptcy filing had been expected.

19:03 ET WorldCom story confirmed by WSJ (WCOM) 0.83 -0.08: -- Update -- The Wall Street Journal is also reporting the WCOM story; like CNBC, it says that over $3 bln in expenses were improperly booked as capital expenditures, though the WSJ claims that this boosted cash flow, which appears incorrect based on the available information. Investors appear to be concluding that this will be the death knell for WCOM and that chapter 11 bankruptcy is now likely; WCOM trading at 0.25, -0.58 from the 4 pm close.

18:26 ET WorldCom engaged in accounting fraud: CNBC (WCOM) 0.83 -0.08: CNBC reporting that WCOM has engaged in fraudulent accounting over the past five quarters; says that company recorded many regular expenses as capital expenditures, boosting EBITDA by $3.6 bln over the past five quarters. CNBC also reports that the CFO has been dismissed in the last 48 hours. Though misreporting regular expenses as capex does not affect cash flow, it can affect estimates of a company's future earnings power; CNBC also adds that the company will soon restate its earnings to reflect these issues. WCOM plunges after hours to 0.38, off 0.50 from the close.



To: Sully- who wrote (53185)6/25/2002 11:06:26 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Some comment on WCOM...

Message 17652534



To: Sully- who wrote (53185)6/27/2002 12:52:20 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
EBITDA Musings : The bubble may be over, but that doesn't mean that rationality has returned to the market. Today, a host of stocks that tend to be valued on EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization) are getting crushed, with the theory apparently being that what happened to Worldcom could happen to them. But it's important to understand that Worldcom's accounting fraud didn't really have anything to do with the fact that they were valued on an EBITDA basis; the deception and the resulting devastation would have been the same even if the company had been valued based on GAAP earnings per share. Based on preliminary reports from the company, it appears that Worldcom reduced operating expenses by categorizing routine maintenance costs on its network as capital spending. This misreporting would reduce every known measure of earnings: GAAP EPS, pro forma EPS, and EBITDA. It could be said that other companies which manage similar networks, whether they're telecom, radio, or cable TV, could have similarly misreported maintenance costs as capital expenses. While this can't be ruled out, it should be noted that it's unlikely that such blatant accounting fraud was repeated at other firms which generally weren't under the same liquidity pressures facing Worldcom. Even in the Worldcom case, it's hard to fathom how the executives responsible for the deception actually believed that it would ultimately help the company or them personally. But in the cases of companies that were still profitable and facing no adverse liquidity issues, to engage in similar accounting fraud would have been beyond stupid (we'll leave open the question of what lies beyond). If investors are looking for companies with a higher probability of Worldcom-type accounting fraud, they would be better served by looking at companies in any sector that were under liquidity pressures, rather than other companies valued on an EBITDA basis. EBITDA valuation was not related to the cause or effect of Worldcom's fraud. - Greg Jones, Briefing.com