SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (266979)6/25/2002 10:19:46 PM
From: gao seng  Respond to of 769667
 
OPIC doing what they are supposed to do, protecting American corporations from some of the risks of investing in developing countries around the world.

But, keep digging, you are getting close to unearthing the complete fraud and crooks formerly known as the Clinton administration.

-- Robert Novak

Enron's corporate welfare

April 29, 2002

BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

A bipartisan Senate Finance Committee investigation has found that Enron Corp., no paragon of free-market deregulation, gorged itself on corporate welfare. The Clinton administration gave more than $650 million in Export-Import Bank loans to Enron-related companies. While the Senate now probes whether the bankrupt energy company falsified loan requests, the bigger question is why Enron was subsidized at all.

Export-Import officials early this year, expressing confidence in the accuracy of information provided by Enron in its loan applications, were not interested in an investigation. However, Ex-Im Vice Chairman Eduardo Aguirre sang a different tune in his April 23 letter to Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the Finance Committee's senior Republican. ''Please let me assure you that Ex-Im Bank takes very seriously potential violations of law . . . and works very closely with the Department of Justice,'' Aguirre wrote.

Finance staffers have found that Ex-Im, as well as the Overseas Private Investment Corp., in a Democratic administration routinely approved loan requests from a supposedly Republican company. Lavish bipartisan political contributions may have helped, as well as a top Enron executive sitting on Ex-Im's Advisory Committee.

Actually, one official of the agency informed a Senate investigator that all Ex-Im really monitors is loan repayment. Ironically, it is unclear whether Enron loans will be defaulted at American taxpayer expense. While the rationale for the Export-Import Bank's existence is to give U.S. businesses a level playing field against government-subsidized foreign competition, the Enron loans merely buttressed questionable projects where the company often was both producer and exporter.

The classic case is a September 1994 Ex-Im direct loan of $302 million ($175 million of which remains unpaid) to Dabhol Power Co. in India, then 80 percent owned by Enron. In this deal, Enron was the ''foreign'' company, and its allies, Bechtel Group and General Electric, were the exporters. With an Indian utility that could not pay its bills (and was pressured by the Bush administration to do so) as its only customer, Dabhol went bankrupt even before Enron.

A less-publicized loan scrutinized by Senate investigators provided $135 million (only $4 million of which has been repaid) to the Accroven partnership for a natural gas plant in Venezuela. Nearly half the company's stock was owned by Enron while Enron also was the exporter. Thus, the U.S. taxpayer was paying Enron money so that Enron could buy gas from Enron.

Enron's loan application for the Accroven project included the company's 1998 annual report, which the company has admitted was falsified. ''I'm troubled by the Ex-Im's seeming lack of interest in this matter,'' Grassley wrote Aguirre on April 2.

Ex-Im lent $250 million to Trakya Elektrik of Turkey, owned 50 percent by Enron, which was buying goods and services from Enron. Ex-Im insured a $3.6 million Citibank loan to Promigas in Colombia, owned 42.3 percent by Enron. Whether or not these loans were based on misleading information, it is difficult see how any of these deals fulfills the Export-Import Bank's avowed purpose of promoting American competition against the world.

While Democratic Sen. Ernest F. Hollings delivered his memorable judgment that Enron benefitted from the Bush presidency on a cash-and-carry basis, the symbiosis between big business and the purveyors of corporate welfare is bipartisan. Just as Enron gave to both parties, Bechtel has contributed $820,000 to Republicans and $730,000 to Democrats since the 1992 elections. Rebecca A. McDonald, CEO of Enron Global Assets, was on Ex-Im's Advisory Committee under President Clinton in 2000 and remained there under President Bush in 2001. How can it be that a major recipient of government largess is advising the agency handing it out?

Except for a fitful effort to trim it down in the early months of the Reagan administration in 1981 and some restraint by the current Bush administration, the Export-Import Bank has sailed through governments of both parties--hardly noticed and never critically examined. A broader scrutiny of the agency's global pursuits is still wanting.

216.239.51.100



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (266979)6/25/2002 11:20:04 PM
From: Frederick Smart  Respond to of 769667
 
Raymond....

>>BUSH STRONGARMS DOMINICANS FOR CONTRIBUTOR
Shamelessly playing the global bully, Bush whomps the Dominican Republic up side the head for the sake of a firm that is under investigation for fraud in the California energy swindles:

msnbc.com

Bush backs El Paso Corp. in battle

GOP booster in contract dispute in Dominican Republicc

By Chip Cummins
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

June 24 — The Bush administration has stepped into a long-simmering legal dispute in the Dominican Republic, threatening to discourage investment there if the dispute isn’t resolved in favor of a significant Republican political contributor.>>

The Wizard is irrelevent.

Don't you "see?"

There's nothing to "fight" about.

We're going to "Take Back America" by loving one another!

119293!!