Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lee who wrote (85994)	6/26/2002 6:34:59 AM
From: burnie	Respond to of 99280

Probably most of you have taken note of the significant number of CFOs that have been "leaving to pursue other interests" since autumn of last year. Anyone seen an article or data on these numbers? Link? TIA burnie

To: Steve Lee who wrote (85994)	6/26/2002 8:29:42 AM
From: EaglePutt	Respond to of 99280

I agree with you Steve. I think you and I are saying the same thing. I think there is justification in all stocks getting spanked. Perhaps these debacles really calls into question the fundamentals of capitalism itself. So why should the babies not get tossed out with the bath water? Sep 11 was a single definable event from which we rebounded, amidst a lot of spin. However, the last few weeks of sell-off really is a cumulative effect of several events and I just cannot see any meaningful rebound at this stage at all. No matter what the spin is or what PPT does.