SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 9:03:06 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
WCOM, WOW...!!...ENE, TYC, etc. wonder which company is next...??

Stay tuned...corruption is coming to a company near you...=)



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 9:53:18 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
It's 'Unpatriotic' to Say That Corrupt Business is Ruining Our Economy
by Robert Scheer

Has the war on terrorism become the modern equivalent of the Roman Circus, drawing the people's
attention away from the failures of those who rule them? Corporate America is a shambles because
deregulation, the mantra of our president and his party, has proved to be a license to steal. Yet to question
our leaders' stewardship of the economy has been made to seem unpatriotic.

Although combating terrorism is of compelling importance--and should have been before Sept. 11--one is
likely to be branded a nut for daring to suggest that the administration might be using current security
threats as a smoke screen to obscure our floundering economy.

Yet, after the miserable performance of the stock market these past five weeks, the forced resignations and
indictments of corporate titans (not to mention the conviction of a top accounting firm), the humbling of the
dollar and a rise in the trade gap, isn't it time to ask whether the war on terrorism isn't being milked as a
convenient distraction? The question seems particularly relevant when our man in the White House has
had close personal and financial ties to the company--Enron--whose demise is the most glaring symbol of
the broad moral disarray of the nation's corporate culture.

Is there any doubt that the chicanery of Enron executives and that of a growing Who's Who of top CEOs
has done more long-term damage to the U.S. economy than the efforts of anti-American terrorists? And
while sending in the Marines to clean up the boardrooms is not feasible, we ought to wake up to the reality
that business greed is subverting the American way of life--and hurting the image of American capitalism
and democracy--more effectively than the ploys of any foreign enemy.

When even Martha Stewart is ethically suspect and her company's stock has plummeted--though not quite
to the depths of Enron, Global Crossing, Tyco, Dynergy, Wal-Mart and Rite Aid--it is time to return to the
wisdom of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Depression-era president who saved capitalism from itself.

Wealthy from birth, FDR had a healthy awareness of the tendency of the upper classes to destabilize
society and even destroy themselves with their greed and hubris. Unlike Karl Marx, however, he believed
the unraveling of capitalism was not inevitable if these excesses could somehow be corralled. Thus was
born the idea of government regulation as the vital support structure for the powerful, fertile but unstable
free market.

Unfortunately, greedy people and institutions don't like being monitored, and they have the means to
corrupt governments and skirt laws.

Since the so-called Reagan Revolution, powerful corporate interests have succeeded in profoundly
damaging the foundation of a properly regulated economy. Company auditors, for example, have become
accomplices to deceptions of the public that should be considered criminal but that often do not violate
statutes written by corporate lobbyists.

Enron provides a startling illustration of a company jumping through loopholes that its D.C. lobbyists have
created. In fact, the Enron scams made possible by deregulation in the first Bush administration are still
being revealed, such as last week's reports that the company hid billions in income during the California
energy crisis while publicly denying it was profiting excessively.

Yet former Enron officials continue to play an important role under Bush the younger. The Bush family, in
fact, has never been seriously confronted by the media or Congress as to its questionable ties to former
Enron Chief Executive Kenneth Lay, a close family friend and top contributor to Bush family presidential
campaigns.

To be fair, the corporate corruption of our political system has long been bipartisan. The Clinton White
House, for example, sponsored major deregulation acts, including the Financial Services Modernization Act,
which reversed consumer protections enacted under Roosevelt, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996,
which effectively ended all public accountability for the communications industry and has permitted a few
media giants to gobble up vast markets.

Clearly, the problem is bipartisan when a Democrat-controlled Senate moves so hesitantly to confront the
myriad examples of sickness in our economy and corporate culture.

The politicians hesitate to act because candidates of both parties are lavishly financed by the very people
who are conning a gullible public.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 10:25:20 AM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
The King Report
M. Ramsey King Securities, Inc.
Wednesday June 26, 2002 - Issue 2447

"Independent View of the News"

Globex SPUs [at press] 950.50, -24.00; USUs 105.12, +2.06 $=120.30yen; euro = .9871 Gold is +$4.30

Enter The Pain

After the close, GE announced they would hold a conference
call on July 18 and reaffirm earnings guidance for this quarter. That's ridiculous - GE already made the
announcement. It's a transparent ploy to produce a
perceived double benefit for GE stock, which is in steep descent. SPUs rallied after the ploy. But the surprises
are negative in a bear market, and this is a super/secular
bear.

Yesterday's session had the smell of bankruptcy anxiety in
the air. WCOM, Amtrak, US Air, UAL, LU were cascading on
fear debt would sink them. After GE's gambit, CNBC
reported that according to WCOM insiders, the company had
cooked earnings the last 5 quarters. The stock fell to
.35 in after-hour trading. WCOM faces the abyss. Will
it take LU, TLAB, and others with it? What about the
bankers and debt holders? Two large JPM blocks traded
after the news; SPUs and NDUs fell precipitous...Micron's
after-the-close report of a 4-cent loss also is
contributing to after-hour and overnight trading distress.

The due bill has arrived for Easy Al and others' duplicity
and malfeasance. As we keep harping, that's what happens
after a busted bubble. Monetary policy is ineffective,
except for a brief rally that allows insiders and the
astute to exit. More money is lost on the resultant
'death march' decline than on the initial bubble burst.
The financial violence worsens. Debt keeps growing;
its unserviceability crushes the economy. The panicky
liquidity cannot get into the economy efficiently. A
daisy chain of bankruptcies ensues; a debt deflation
spiral occurs. It takes years to remedy the excess
debt and capacity.

The hellish consequences of Easy Al and Slick's '90s bubble
are arriving with increasing frequency and intensity.
Long-time readers know we constantly lambasted the corruption, fraud, and chicanery of the late '90s. Bubbles don't
occur by accident. The bubble was partly designed to keep
Slick out of jail. Many people thought our continual
bashing of Slick was solely political, but as we tried
to articulate, we were disgusted at the massive corruption
that permeated virtually every facet of US society. We
often mentioned that the US would pay dearly for the
venality of the '90s. That is now transpiring in the
military, intelligence agencies, Justice, corporate
America, the Church, stocks, etc.

Slick posted a for-sale sign on the US, and every insider
and wise guy knew it. Everything was for sale, and ethics
were discarded for quick profits. Non-financial profits
peaked in 1997, but accounting chicanery kept the game
going. The government manipulated economic data. Fraud
was ubiquitous. It was obvious; and the consequences
weren't a forecast; they were a certainty.

As bankruptcies proliferate, Congress and Bush will be
pressured to act. They will select winners and losers,
since everyone can't be saved. What telecom, techs, etc.
will be given Chrysler-like sustenance?

US banks will resemble Japanese banks. Soon, politicians, academicians, media, etal can issue the same bromides
to US banks that they arrogantly hurled at the Japanese.

In overnight trading, bonds are up a deuce, stocks futures
are cascading, gold is up $4, and the dollar is tanking.
Today will be coyote ugly. Critical technical support
levels will be obliterated. As we kept warning, stocks
were sick, but misguided traders kept usurping the necessary purging. We also stated that market action implied that something or someone was 'in trouble'. The news that
WCOM's CFO was fired 48 hours ago is just one factor that
has emerged. They are undoubtedly many othe...There will
be various and sundry rumors as to who 'is in trouble';
some will be true. The obligatory purging is commencing.
And as we warned, the final stage is vicious; prices
decline to unfathomable levels due to forced liquidation…
When or will the Plunge Protection Team surface?

Euros are up sharply overnight. The market is starting to
price in a rate cut. This is extremely bad news as the rate cuts are innocuous for both the economy and stock market,
but are anathema to the dollar.

Federal Express cut next quarter guidance, triggering a
collapse in rails. The rails had been huge post-9/11
winners as the obvious alternative to airlines and as a
key beneficiary of the widely heralded economic rebound.
FDX's pronouncement is a more prescient economic forecast
than an econometric model. So much for the LEI and other
overly dependent-on-monetary-policy indicators.

Treasury's announced cancellation of the 2-year auction,
due to Congressional inaction on raising the debt ceiling, boosted bonds and crippled stocks.

Please disregard talk about how sentiment is so negative
it signals a massive rally. Just as bullish sentiment goes
and stays at extremes in bubbles, the reciprocal occurs in
bear markets. But most importantly, as we keep saying, valuations are the true indicator of sentiment. When tech stocks still trade at 60 to 80 PEs and major market indices sport historically high PEs, sentiment is still extremely bullish.

CNET reports, "Apple Computer, which initially could not meet demand for its new flat-panel iMac, now appears to have the opposite problem. Retailers and distributors who had to wait weeks after the product's January introduction to get their hands on the desk lamp-shaped desktops now find the machines piling up as the consumer PC market slows to a crawl."

The Chicago Tribune, citing the Illinois Association of Realtors, says housing prices are up 15.1% in Q1 for the
Chicago area. Some areas, like Oak Park are up 27.3%.
But that won't show in CPI.

You know that housing price surge? Well if LU goes, parts
of New Jersey and Chicago western suburbs won't have to
worry about the housing bubble. This will be repeated throughout the US - where ever teetering corporations
and depended entities are domiciled.

For the past 20 years, Wall Street and others bragged
that 'just in time' inventory management made US business
and the economy more efficient. Yesterday, the WSJ had
a front-page article blaming the erstwhile-trumpeted
practice for retarding the recovery.

There will be even more Congressional hearings into the
ways and means of the financial fraud and carnage that
is still unfolding. But when will hearings into
Congressional and Executive fraud occur?

We said it many times over the past several years, and
we'll say it again. "The level of speculation in a
society is directly proportional to the level of corruption."
We don't recall the quote's originator.

<A HREF="http://www.LeMetropoleCafe.com/entrance.cfm"> Le Metropole Cafe</A>

All the best,

Bill Murphy
Le Patron
www.LeMetropoleCafe.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 10:42:44 AM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 89467
 
By Ned W. Schmidt CFA,CEBS
June 25 2002

Canadians know it. In the past year their currency recently traded at an all time low. Argentina knows it. No on alive wants their currency. The Russians know it. Their currency tribulations cost them an empire, and eviscerated a once great military power. In fact just about everybody in the entire world understands the importance of the value of a nation's currency and that currency values are determined in a global market. But, the "just about everybody" seems to exclude many in the U.S.A.

The dollar is depreciating, the Euro is rising and Gold is going up. The reporting team at CNBC is baffled. So, what do they do? The talk about Worldcom and Martha Stewart. Who cares? Will the one person living in North Dakota getting only one cable channel who cares about Martha Stewart stock please raise your hand? In the grand scheme of the world, neither WCOM or MSO matter. Move on Penguins! WCOM will probably be delisted while Gold will continue to trade.

Problems with print journalists abound also. One wrote, FT 25 Jun 2002, "The dollar's fall has so far been benign, . . . it is down 9.5% per cent since its peak in January." Benign? That works out to almost 20% annualized. Benign? The only thing worse is a NASDAQ tech stock. An "A" for punctuation and a "D" for mathematics.

We are at this moment supposed to be finishing the third article on U.S. inflation and its role in Gold's march to over $1,254. We will of course finish it though it has grown probably to two more articles rather than one. But Monday's news articles on the "wisdom" of a former member of the Myopic Monetary Policy Center of the Universe, or the Federal Reserve if you prefer, caught our attention. According to The Financial Times, 24 June 2002, in an interview Lawrence Meyer suggested that if the U.S. economy's growth rate is sub-par the Federal Reserve just might lower rates.

Lower rates in the face of a depreciating currency? They might try it. That approach has never worked for any other country in such a situation. This approach is an example of the myopic monetary policy of the United States. The Federal Reserve continues to operate as if the U.S. is the world economy rather than part of it.

The U.S. dollar has flat broken down, and that is now even apparent in the various dollar indices. Gold had already been telling us that. After a 9/11 a rally developed. It died on the cross of economic reality. As can be seen in the first graph the dollar has recently taken out the low of last Summer, and did so with a vengeance. That ends any meaningful discussion of the dollar's strength.

Gold investors are generally ahead of the curve on the dollar. Gold is a pure measure of the value of a currency. Calculated indices, like that in the graph, are poor measures. They include currencies against which few care about the dollar's performance. In other words, looking at Gold's evaluation of the dollar is a far better measure than calculated indices.

Part of the goal is always to find the reason why after the fact. Doing so gives us something to talk about. Clearly the continued failure of the U.S. stock market is putting downward pressure on the U.S. dollar. Little motivation exists for foreign investors to put money into a market that is rushing down the drain.

The deeper meanings are more important to investor understanding. At the Federal Reserve they are trying to stimulate economic growth. What is happening though is consumers are buying foreign goods. The trade deficit expanded to $35.9 billion in April, A RECORD. Imports jumped almost 5% as consumers bought more foreign goods. The current account deficit is merrily marching under the leadership of the Fed Res right into the danger zone where serious devaluation is the only consequence.

Conclusion? The more the Federal Reserve stimulates the economy the worse the fundamental situation for the U.S. dollar becomes. Lowering interest rates will not make the U.S. economy grow, but rather will simply increase imports. These policies are simply making the situation worse.

Only two ways exist to resolve the fundamental problem shown in the second graph. A deep, deep recession is one possibility. The Federal Reserve does not seem likely to jump on that one really fast. The second choice is to keep going till the dollar devalues to the extent that U.S. consumers cannot afford those foreign goods. We might call this the "Argentinian Solution, and seems to be where the U.S. is headed. Is the U.S. to become the Argentina of North America? Will the Senate ultimately attempt to force us to convert our bank accounts to government bonds?

Besides a strong case of myopia the Federal Reserve has a strong case of hubris. The Fed's groupies actually think believe the Fed is bigger than the market. They will learn differently. Global markets are now beginning to move to punish the U.S. for its excessive current account deficit. Global markets are moving to push the U.S. back into recession, the U.S. dollar into devaluation and the dollar price of Gold higher.

We are going to try to make a complex subject simple. In doing so we will leave out some details. >From those that realize that we hope for compassion. The essence of the process is what is important. .

We start with a graph of the supply and demand for Euro. Demand curves are downward sloping as the more Euros would be demanded as the price of Euros declines. The supply curve is the vertical line, and in the short-run that is a reasonable assumption. Any movement of the supply curve only makes the case we are discussing stronger.

The demand curve for Euro has shifted upward and to the right, from the lower demand line to the higher one. Around the world more Euros are being demanded. Why? All those reasons being put forth have some merit. People have too many dollars. The U.S. stock market is lousy. All of the arguments for not owning dollars seem to be operational. For space reasons we suggest anyone that wants further discussion of this process send us an email.

As the demand curve for Euros has shifted the dollar value of the Euro has risen. The arrows show the implication. The dollar value of the Euro has risen. The Euro has appreciated and the dollar has depreciated. At the same time the Gold value of the dollar has fallen and the dollar value of Gold has risen. Investors need to become comfortable with these relationships as they will be essential understanding in the future.

Now, let us reason further. A rising demand for Euros means people around the world want to own more Euros. They satisfy that demand for Euros by buying them. To buy those Euros they must sell dollar denominated assets. That process is fairly straightforward. So, foreign investors apparently are selling dollar denominated investments.

If foreign investors are selling dollar assets that implies the demand for U.S. assets is falling. A natural repercussion of that is that interest rates in the U.S. should be rising. However, the gurus at the Federal Reserve do not want interest rates to rise. What keeps interest rates from rising? The Federal Reserve buys securities, or monetizes the creation of debt.

What this means is that the Federal Reserve is sitting on the pressure release valve. Rather than taking the recession and dollar depreciation now, the Federal Reserve is fighting the market. The consequences of this effort are two. First, the dollar devaluation will be greater than necessary and most expect. Second, interest rates in the U.S. will eventually go up and up in dramatic fashion.

The final act of the Greenspan recession has not yet been written. Pressures are building. Federal Reserve, as Japan did, is fighting the natural economic process. When the pressures are released, the second dip in the U.S. economic recession will arrive, and it will be ugly. Home prices will be decimated. Many U.S. citizens will see most of their remaining wealth eliminated. Home equity loans will be worth no more than the paper on which they are written. Beware of holdings related to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

The only remaining refuge for financial security lies with Gold. Only it will benefit from Federal Reserve's policies. $1,254 Gold will be just one of the consequences of the Fed's policies. That the Euro and Yen are appreciating against the U.S. dollar is a strong signal. Even the fiat paper money of other governments is deemed to be worth more. And before we forget, Canadian investors should be using the strength in that currency to RUN.

And what are our friend in the print media reporting? The 1 July 2002 issue of Business Week arrived. This magazine is one that should be read, and youngest daughter received a subscription for Christmas. That praise aside, the latest issue has the "Midyear Investment Guide." This "special" runs from page 99 to page 132, though with a lot of advertising. Most of us know that Gold has been one of the best investments the past three years and is likely to continue to do well.

Do the editors and writers at Business Week mention Gold? If they did, I could not find it. Either they do not know about Gold's performance or do not want to report it. Conspiracy or ineptness? The answer is probably some of both. So, what good is a "Midyear Investment Guide" if it does not even mention Gold? Yes I agree, but that cannot be printed.

As a closing note, let us remember the impact of the Russian currency devaluation on their military power. No longer able to afford the costs of maintaining their military much of it was abandoned in place. Fleets, of ships and missiles, were left where they sat to come under the control of whomever came into power. Economics does matter to military power. The Spanish Empire in part lost its naval muscle when it could no longer afford to import the special timbers needed for masts.

No end or treaty appears in site for the Pan Eurasian Islamic War. What are the implications for the nations of the "Allies of Freedom" if the U.S. becomes less able to afford to deploy its military might? Will the oil be safe from internal insurrection by Islamic extremists? Being involved in a War at the same time one's currency is put at risk is a dangerous predicament. The ramifications of a collapsing U.S. dollar extend beyond a little inflation and a collapse of the Greenspan Housing Bubble. Survival in the world ahead may be a function of military capability, and military capability is a function of economic might. Myopic economic policy makers that ignore the many ramifications of a depreciating dollar are putting a great deal at risk, a nation.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 10:42:58 AM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 89467
 
ignore-duplicate



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 2:26:49 PM
From: habitrail  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
why are silver rounds cheaper than silver eagles?
Is it the IRA factor?



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 2:38:20 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Enron Criminal Investigation Is Said to Expand to Bankers

By KURT EICHENWALD and DAVID BARBOZA
The New York Times
June 26, 2002

Criminal investigators examining the Enron debacle have expanded their inquiry to focus on activities at the commercial banks that provided billions of dollars in loans and other financial services to the company, according to current and former Enron executives and others involved in the investigation.

Federal prosecutors are investigating whether individual bankers illegally benefited from deals involving Enron-related entities, potentially at the expense of their employers, people involved in the case said. A number of bankers have been questioned about such self-dealing, lawyers said, and the government is said to be weighing whether to bring charges in one such matter.

The government has also stepped up its examination of an Enron-related partnership called Chewco. The financing for the partnership included loans from Barclays Bank structured in ways that hid them from Enron's auditors, according to Congressional testimony. The discovery of the hidden loans ultimately played a central role in the financial crisis last fall that led to Enron's collapse.

The Manhattan district attorney's office, meanwhile, working independently of the federal Enron task force, has opened its own inquiry into an array of transactions and financial institutions tied to Enron. According to current and former Enron executives who have been questioned by the Manhattan investigators, these include a series of deals between Enron and J. P. Morgan Chase that have been described in private lawsuits as disguised loans to the energy company.

While investigators for the district attorney, Robert Morgenthau, have begun interviewing witnesses in Houston, where Enron is based, and overseas, the Manhattan prosecutors do not appear to be close to bringing any charges, people involved in the case said. There is no indication that the banks themselves are targets of the inquiry.

Combined with the recent conviction of Enron's former accountant, Arthur Andersen, these latest lines of inquiry signal that investigators are putting the conduct of the company's financial advisers under a harsh light, even as they consider bringing charges of fraud and related crimes against Enron's former top executives.

Banks had complex financial relationships with Enron, and the full details of those only began to emerge amid the debris of the collapsed company. Like most companies, Enron borrowed money to finance its operations. But banks also provided cash for the company's off-the-books partnerships and for outside investors in those entities. Some financial institutions and bankers were themselves investors in the partnerships.

Major New York banks, meanwhile, engaged in circular trades with Enron that allowed the company to obtain billions of dollars in loans without disclosing them to shareholders, according to trading records and court documents.

The federal investigation of banking matters related to Enron stepped up in recent weeks, even as much of the Justice Department's task force on the scandal was occupied with the long-running criminal prosecution of Andersen.

According to people involved in the case, some of that effort was handled behind the scenes by William Kimball, a task force prosecutor who specializes in securities-related cases. Mr. Kimball, an assistant United States attorney in San Francisco, has long worked with Leslie Caldwell, the head of the Washington-based task force.

Mr. Kimball was said to be focusing on matters related to Chewco, which was formed by an Enron financial executive in 1997 to engage in transactions with Enron. Under accounting rules, at least 3 percent of Chewco's capital had to come from independent investors for Enron to keep the partnership's financial results off the company's books.

At least part of the outside equity for Chewco purportedly came from Barclays through an entity called Big River, whose sole member was another entity called Little River. But Andersen learned that the money from Barclays was actually a loan secured by $6.6 million in cash collateral.

Since the supposed equity investment was actually a loan, Andersen insisted that Chewco failed the 3 percent test and its finances had to be consolidated with those of Enron — a decision that was a big factor in a huge restatement of Enron's financial results last November.

In recent weeks, Mr. Kimball, the prosecutor, was said to have been interviewing numerous participants involved in the structuring of the Chewco transaction, including bankers from Barclays. Telephone calls to a bank spokesman went unanswered late yesterday. However, a spokesman for the bank had previously said that it did not believe that there was "any basis" for a claim against it. Bank officials have also said there was no personal investment by Barclays executives in the deal.

Separately, according to people involved in the case, bankers interviewed by the government have repeatedly been pressed about whether they enriched themselves in dealings with people or entities related to Enron.

In an instance involving at least one American bank, these people said, prosecutors have discovered evidence of such self-dealing, and were said to be deciding whether to bring indictments. The identity of the bank and the employees involved could not be immediately determined.

The investigation by the Manhattan district attorney's office has been proceeding for at least several weeks. Witnesses said that they had been questioned about transactions between Enron and Morgan that involved an off-shore entity known as Mahonia Ltd. In addition, at least two witnesses were asked by investigators about a transaction that involved Citigroup and an off-shore entity called Delta.

Kristin Lemkau, a spokeswoman for Morgan, declined to comment, as did Daniel Noonan, a spokesman for Citigroup.

Mr. Morgenthau, who has a long-established reputation for fierce independence, has frequently investigated both banking matters and cases involving off-shore financial maneuvers. At this stage, people involved in the case said, his investigation appeared to be completely independent of the federal inquiry.

In the Mahonia deals, according to records of the transactions and energy industry experts, Enron appears to have used natural gas trades with a series of offshore companies linked to Morgan to move hundreds of millions of dollars in loans off its books.

The gas-trading transactions have led to charges in bankruptcy court that Enron and Morgan intentionally misrepresented the nature of the deals to obtain surety bonds from insurance companies. With Enron's collapse, the insurers, including the St. Paul Companies and Liberty Mutual, are balking at making payment.

The transactions involved a web of corporations — several of them based in the Channel Islands — including Mahonia and Stoneville Aegean Ltd. that at first blush seem independent but whose records show are linked companies with ties to Morgan.

The companies traded gas in a circle, with Enron both being required to deliver the commodity on a future date and being owed the same amount of gas for delivery on the same date at the same price.

The transactions involving Citigroup and Delta, which is based in the Cayman Islands, functioned in a similar way, according to a lawsuit filed by Enron shareholders. According to that suit, Citigroup used Delta to carry out $2.4 billion of financial "swaps" with Enron that "perfectly replicated loans and were, in fact, loans," but were not disclosed on Enron's books.

One current Enron official who reviewed the deal said that it was done to improve the company's cash flow through a transaction that appeared on the books as a trading liability rather than as debt. That helped Enron in its dealings with the rating agencies, the official said.

The Manhattan investigators have obtained documents related to both the Mahonia and Delta transactions, according to current and former Enron executives who have been interviewed.

Some of those witnesses have also recently been interviewed by investigators from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

nytimes.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/26/2002 3:14:58 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
This is worth considering...

Bush Overplays the Terror Card
By Robert Scheer
Published June 25, 2002
The Los Angeles Times

Has the war on terrorism become the modern equivalent of the Roman Circus, drawing the people's attention away from the failures of those who rule them? Corporate America is a shambles because deregulation, the mantra of our president and his party, has proved to be a license to steal. Yet to question our leaders' stewardship of the economy has been made to seem unpatriotic.

Although combating terrorism is of compelling importance--and should have been before Sept. 11--one is likely to be branded a nut for daring to suggest that the administration might be using current security threats as a smoke screen to obscure our floundering economy.

Yet, after the miserable performance of the stock market these past five weeks, the forced resignations and indictments of corporate titans (not to mention the conviction of a top accounting firm), the humbling of the dollar and a rise in the trade gap, isn't it time to ask whether the war on terrorism isn't being milked as a convenient distraction? The question seems particularly relevant when our man in the White House has had close personal and financial ties to the company--Enron--whose demise is the most glaring symbol of the broad moral disarray of the nation's corporate culture.

Is there any doubt that the chicanery of Enron executives and that of a growing Who's Who of top CEOs has done more long-term damage to the U.S. economy than the efforts of anti-American terrorists? And while sending in the Marines to clean up the boardrooms is not feasible, we ought to wake up to the reality that business greed is subverting the American way of life--and hurting the image of American capitalism and democracy--more effectively than the ploys of any foreign enemy.

When even Martha Stewart is ethically suspect and her company's stock has plummeted--though not quite to the depths of Enron, Global Crossing, Tyco, Dynergy, Wal-Mart and Rite Aid--it is time to return to the wisdom of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Depression-era president who saved capitalism from itself.

Wealthy from birth, FDR had a healthy awareness of the tendency of the upper classes to destabilize society and even destroy themselves with their greed and hubris. Unlike Karl Marx, however, he believed the unraveling of capitalism was not inevitable if these excesses could somehow be corralled. Thus was born the idea of government regulation as the vital support structure for the powerful, fertile but unstable free market.

Unfortunately, greedy people and institutions don't like being monitored, and they have the means to corrupt governments and skirt laws.

Since the so-called Reagan Revolution, powerful corporate interests have succeeded in profoundly damaging the foundation of a properly regulated economy. Company auditors, for example, have become accomplices to deceptions of the public that should be considered criminal but that often do not violate statutes written by corporate lobbyists.

Enron provides a startling illustration of a company jumping through loopholes that its D.C. lobbyists have created. In fact, the Enron scams made possible by deregulation in the first Bush administration are still being revealed, such as last week's reports that the company hid billions in income during the California energy crisis while publicly denying it was profiting excessively.

Yet former Enron officials continue to play an important role under Bush the younger. The Bush family, in fact, has never been seriously confronted by the media or Congress as to its questionable ties to former Enron Chief Executive Kenneth Lay, a close family friend and top contributor to Bush family presidential campaigns.

To be fair, the corporate corruption of our political system has long been bipartisan. The Clinton White House, for example, sponsored major deregulation acts, including the Financial Services Modernization Act, which reversed consumer protections enacted under Roosevelt, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which effectively ended all public accountability for the communications industry and has permitted a few media giants to gobble up vast markets.

Clearly, the problem is bipartisan when a Democrat-controlled Senate moves so hesitantly to confront the myriad examples of sickness in our economy and corporate culture.

The politicians hesitate to act because candidates of both parties are lavishly financed by the very people who are conning a gullible public.

*

Robert Scheer writes a syndicated column. Copyright 2002

robertscheer.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/27/2002 1:03:42 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Cyber-Attacks by Al Qaeda Feared

Terrorists at Threshold of Using Internet as Tool of Bloodshed, Experts Say

By Barton Gellman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 27, 2002; Page A01

washingtonpost.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (740)6/27/2002 1:27:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
The FOMC statement...

Message 17657810