SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (175480)6/26/2002 9:01:15 AM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
depends on what bonds do and how good that earnings estimate is...

205.232.165.149

doesn't look undervalued to me



To: MythMan who wrote (175480)6/26/2002 9:12:49 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
You're not still touting that Fed model. Geeze. That and the range are both myths now. -bg/ng



To: MythMan who wrote (175480)6/26/2002 9:52:51 AM
From: Earlie  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
Myth:

Just went LONG (not a typo) on a couple of my favs.

Best, Earlie



To: MythMan who wrote (175480)6/26/2002 10:25:50 AM
From: reaper  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<If we open where I think we will, Fed model will be >20% undervalued. >>

Unless of course you believe that earnings are overstated by oh, say, 50%, in which case the market is still OVER-valued by a wide margin.

Got EBITDA?? (apparantly WCOM doesn't) <g>

Cheers


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News