SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (86357)6/26/2002 12:16:41 PM
From: Pierre  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
The problem with QCOM is that a lot of their existing "assets" may have to be written down drastically (not only by that amount, but also by greater amounts that are circuits worth much less today than when they were installed).

Oh god, Zeev - hope that's not Freudian. <vbg>

Pierre



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (86357)6/26/2002 12:25:24 PM
From: thecalculator  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Hey Zeev, when a company invests in a P4 to replace their PII so that winbloze boots up in 2 minutes instead of 4 minutes, is that a CAPEX expenditure or a maintenance expenditure? <g>

As an aside, regardless of what some of you ludites think, there definitely are some efficiencies gained in upgrading to a faster computer, depending on the tasks undertaken. For example, when compiling reports with data and photos, the productivity gained is well worth the expenditure IMTO.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (86357)6/26/2002 12:29:40 PM
From: jazzcat2000  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Zeev, what QCOM "assets" are you talking about that have to be "written down"? Also you refer to "circuts that are worth much less today than when they were installed". Are you sure you were talking about QCOM? Thanks.