SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Constant Reader who wrote (15616)6/26/2002 5:14:56 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 21057
 
Any system that can demand body parts

The system wouldn't "demand" body parts. The criminal would make restitution in some way to be negotiated. I think that Bill Gates would appropriately offer his kidney to compensate me for the one he wrongfully took from me as the best possible way to make amends. If he were unwilling, though, then we would negotiate something else. Perhaps he'd buy me a dialysis machine.

How do you propose correcting a subsequently discovered wrongful conviction?

My model assumes that convicted criminals are guilty. My model addresses one subsystem of the criminal justice system in isolation and makes certain assumptions about the rest for the purpose of illustrating the role of retribution and punishment. Haven't thought through the rest of the system yet. One step at a time. You're right, wrongful convictions would have to be factored in. Just not yet. Gotta keep it simple for now to make the point about retribution.



To: Constant Reader who wrote (15616)6/26/2002 5:36:25 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 21057
 
Taking the prosecutor's kidney?
NOW THERE'S AN IDEA! :-)

Sure would make them be careful. :-)