Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 5:39:16 PM
From: Paul Shread	Respond to of 209892

Flat <eom>

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 5:47:55 PM
From: Shack	Respond to of 209892

Very slightly long.

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 5:50:09 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 209892

aggressively short

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 5:52:00 PM
From: The Freep	Respond to of 209892

slightly short in stature oh, and in my portfolio, too

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 5:53:18 PM
From: UnBelievable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Very Short

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 6:07:54 PM
From: John Madarasz	Respond to of 209892

flat

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 6:20:41 PM
From: Doo	Respond to of 209892

It's after 4pm ET, so I'm flat. ;)

To: NOW who wrote (43459)	6/26/2002 7:58:38 PM
From: bcrafty	Respond to of 209892

longer than I am short, and have golds too I think that's an important distinction because being long on golds isn't the same as being long on, for example, "glamour trash." But I agree with Shack's comment in the last post that it is more likely that the "c" is done than it is that we'll get fresh up.