SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (143431)6/26/2002 7:34:28 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
From Mary Meeker.
Look on the bright side?

Despite fear and loathing in the markets, Morgan Stanley issued a report Wednesday, highlighting the upside to investing in Net stocks. "Given still strong 20-plus percent global growth in Internet users and usage, we continue to believe our stocks could outperform over the next 12 to 18 months," wrote Morgan Stanley. The report said that second-quarter results for EBay (EBAY: news, chart, profile), Yahoo (YHOO: news, chart, profile), Amazon.com (AMZN: news, chart, profile), Microsoft (MSFT: news, chart, profile) and Intuit (INTU: news, chart, profile) should be in line or positive.



To: GST who wrote (143431)6/26/2002 8:03:52 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Founded in February 1996, this Mountain View, CA company develops high performance IP networking systems.
JNPR cisco's biggest competitor which peaked at $250 ps was on sale today for $4.70 ps so I bought it.
I think like a Billy VC... sooner or later 1 in 10 might work out.:)



To: GST who wrote (143431)6/26/2002 8:10:43 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
By Jake Batsell
Seattle Times business reporter

A hill of beans: Starbucks stock price has soared since 1992
When Howard Schultz and Orin Smith hit the road to pitch Starbucks' initial public offering in 1992, many of the Wall Street investors they courted were incredulous.

"They'd say, 'You mean, you're going to sell coffee for a dollar in a paper cup, with Italian names that no one in America can say? At a time in America when no one's drinking coffee? And I can get coffee at the local coffee shop or doughnut shop for 50 cents? Are you kidding me?' " Schultz, company chairman, recalled recently.

"Some people would just dismiss us — it was over. We'd say, 'Can we finish?' And they'd say, 'You can finish, but we're not interested.' "

Eventually, of course, Schultz and Smith, now the company's chief executive, converted enough believers to pull off one of the decade's most heralded IPOs. Since going public on the Nasdaq Stock Market 10 years ago today, Starbucks has seen its shares swell by more than 2,200 percent and split four times as it turned lattes into a daily staple for millions.

Schultz has even grander expectations for the next decade, saying Starbucks is aiming for "Coke-like" status as a world brand and could grow to more than 20,000 stores. But as the company continues to spread across the globe, skeptics wonder whether its aggressive expansion will cut into profit.

It would be a double-tall order for Starbucks to duplicate the staggering returns of its first decade as a public company. Just before the IPO, the company had about 140 stores — mostly in the Northwest and Chicago — and was mentioned in the same breath as small-scale coffee chains such as Illinois-based Gloria Jean's Coffee Bean and Barnie's Coffee & Tea of Florida.

Starbucks raised more than $25 million in its public offering, helping it open more stores in the West and, a year later, on the East Coast. It quickly emerged as North America's dominant specialty-coffee brand, and today the company has more than 5,500 stores in 28 countries and is worth some $9.5 billion.

"When you look at what Starbucks did, they created this space," said Don Gher, managing director of Coldstream Capital Management in Bellevue, which owns more than 365,000 Starbucks shares. "You had the Gloria Jean's, the small stands and others around for years, but nobody else really was able to put something together like this."

Schultz credits Starbucks' prosperous run to the quality of its coffee, strong employee loyalty and "a little bit of luck."

"What we have built has universal appeal," he said. "It's based on the human spirit, it's based on a sense of community, the need for people to come together."

The company has had its share of misfires along the way, most recently with failed investments in Internet startups such as Living.com and Kozmo.com. Gher said those episodes "may have been the best thing that could have happened to the company, because it made them realize that they need to stick with their own knitting."

Many retailers and restaurants saw a dip in business over the past year as the nation struggled through a recession and a post-Sept. 11 malaise. But Starbucks' sales have continued to rise. Since December, monthly sales at stores open longer than a year have been up between 3 and 10 percent.

"I think we've demonstrated that we are close to a recession-proof product," Schultz said.

Emboldened by its recent foray into continental Europe, Starbucks is shooting to have 10,000 stores in 60 countries by the end of 2005.

And Schultz, who stepped down as CEO in June 2000 and assumed the title of chief global strategist, said that after two years in his new job, he's convinced Starbucks could grow to more than 20,000 stores.

"The next 10 years will demonstrate the fact that these are still the early days of the company."

But as Starbucks fans out across the globe, some fear its expansion could take a bite out of profit, at least in the near term.

Andrew Barish, an analyst for Banc of America Securities, recently wrote that Starbucks' profit growth could slow over the next few quarters, weighed down by higher costs to support its international partners and to take its technology and distribution global.

The company also was panned in a recent Barron's article that raised concerns about expansion costs, slowing U.S. specialty-coffee consumption and the specter of rising bean prices. The stock fell 75 cents on the next trading day but has rebounded, climbing more than $1.

Higher international spending is necessary to take full advantage of Starbucks' growth potential, Schultz said, and the company has acquired nearly two years' worth of green coffee supplies, reducing its exposure to sudden price swings.

Schultz has hinted for months that the company is brewing up some new partnerships with major companies, some involving the reloadable cards introduced in November.

Any new products or partnerships Starbucks takes on, Gher said, need to "make sense in the scheme of the brand," which centers around coffee. But as long as the company guards against over-reaching, Gher said he sees room for more growth and profit in the next 10 years.

"The market will take care of the stock price, if they take care of the earnings," Gher said. "This is a company that historically has always said they want to under-promise and over-deliver, and I think they're continuing to do that."



To: GST who wrote (143431)6/27/2002 9:18:09 AM
From: Alomex  Respond to of 164684
 
Excerpted from the Economist:

economist.com

For the time being, though, the pessimists seem to have the upper hand. The stockmarket correction which many economists have argued was long overdue now seems to be taking place in a way that no one could have predicted. The ratio of share prices to earnings, traditionally a measure of whether shares are overvalued, is, for many companies, still at historically high levels.

The persistent strength of the dollar in recent years has also caused increasing concern. A strong dollar has made life difficult for American exporters and has helped fuel protectionist pressure in America—pressure to which, in the eyes of America’s trading partners, President George Bush has shown himself uncomfortably willing to respond. And America’s soaring current-account deficit has looked increasingly unsustainable without a significant downward adjustment in the dollar’s value.

Even if such corrections are inevitable, there are dangers when adjustments take place in an atmosphere of near-hysteria in the markets. When investors and traders panic, they have a tendency to over-react—shares get dumped indiscriminately, for instance, without investors making judgments about the relative worth of individual shares.

This is especially likely to happen when people realise that some firms are willing to pull the wool over their eyes, even to the extent of perpetrating accounting frauds. Investors are hardly inclined to try to decide on the merits of their investments when Rite Aid, Enron, WorldCom and many other companies have tried to disguise the true state of their finances. The typical shareholder is wondering who else is guilty.

But as a result, many well-run, genuinely profitable companies will get marked down in the rush to dump shares. They will find it difficult to raise money for investment, which, in turn, could undermine recovery. With growth sluggish or non-existent elsewhere, the global recovery still depends very heavily on America. A faltering American economy would spell trouble for many other parts of the world.

It is true that a cheaper dollar could, in theory, bring benefits if it boosts American exports. Higher demand from abroad for American goods would help compensate for any loss of consumer confidence. But currency markets also notoriously overshoot at times of market turbulence. Once market sentiment starts to push a currency down (or up) it can become relentless.


economist.com