SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : One Big Scam? CTRN, ECTS, IVHD, SMEK & MALB -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bear Down who wrote (536)7/9/2002 7:03:11 PM
From: jjs64  Respond to of 559
 
Hahahahaha Tosto finally getting some of what he deserves. I can only hope Ed Williamson can join him, though for Ed it would be a return trip to prison.

Buyer Beware!



To: Bear Down who wrote (536)7/13/2002 3:31:29 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 559
 
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

too damn funny bro



To: Bear Down who wrote (536)2/5/2003 2:09:57 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Respond to of 559
 
From today's SEC Digest:

PETER LYBRAND F/K/A PETER TOSTO

On Feb. 5, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Peter C. Lybrand, formerly known as Peter C. Tosto, based on his alleged previous criminal conviction in United States v. Tosto, Crim. Information No. 00 Cr 1082 (DC). The Division of Enforcement alleges that Lybrand was sentenced for his conduct on March 15, 2001, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

In addition, the Division of Enforcement alleges that on March 28, 2002, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a default judgment against Lybrand, permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (SEC v. Lybrand, et al., Civil Action No. 00-1387).

The criminal complaint and the Commission's complaint alleged, among other things, that Lybrand orchestrated a complex series of transactions in which he acquired control of three shell corporations, created artificial trading markets in the stocks of those corporations, artificially inflated the prices of the stocks, and profited from the fraud through unregistered sales of the stocks into the public markets.

The Division of Enforcement instituted public administrative proceedings pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act to afford Lybrand the opportunity to establish a defense to the Order's allegations and to determine what, if any, remedial action is appropriate in the public interest, and whether a penny stock bar is appropriate, against Lybrand. (Rel. 34- 47313; File No. 3-11028)

sec.gov



To: Bear Down who wrote (536)11/6/2003 4:55:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 559
 
Richard S. Kern, Donald R. Kern and Charles Wilkins Are Permanently Enjoined
and Ordered to Pay $7.7 Million in Disgorgement and Interest and $1.1 Million
in Civil Penalties

On Sept. 11, 2003, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
New York found that Richard S. Kern, of Weston, Florida, Donald R. Kern,
of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and Charles Wilkins, of Scottsdale,
Arizona, had engaged in fraud and deceit by participating in a "market
manipulation that resulted in millions of dollars in losses to unwitting
investors, and could not have occurred but for defendants' active
involvement and knowledge." In a Final Judgment entered on Oct. 2,
2003, the Court enjoined Richard Kern, Donald Kern, and Charles Wilkins,
and three entities, EFI Corp., Barclay Bankcard, Inc., and Canyon Vista
Corp., from violating Section 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act of
1933. Defendants Richard Kern, Donald Kern, and Charles Wilkins
previously had consented, without admitting or denying the Commission's
allegations, to an injunction prohibiting them from violating Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

The Court ordered Richard Kern, Donald Kern, and Charles Wilkins to pay
disgorgement of almost $6 million, plus prejudgment interest of about
$1.7 million, jointly and severally with EFI Corp., Barclay Bankcard,
Inc., and Canyon Vista Corp. The Court ordered relief defendants Hannah
R Trust and Hannah G Irrevocable Trust to pay disgorgement of almost $1
million, plus prejudgment interest of approximately $280,000. The Court
also ordered Richard and Donald Kern to pay a civil penalty of $400,000
each, and ordered Charles Wilkins to pay a $300,000 civil penalty. When
determining whether to impose the penalties, the Court considered, among
other things, "the individuals' lack of cooperation with the SEC with
respect to the diminution of assets - the proceeds of illegal activities
- that were frozen pursuant to an Order of this Court on July 6, 2000."

The Commission's complaint, filed on Feb. 24, 2000, alleged that the
Kerns and Wilkins aided and abetted co-defendant Peter C. Lybrand in a
stock manipulation and that the Kerns and Wilkins made unregistered
sales of the securities of three shell corporations: Polus, Inc.,
Citron, Inc., and Electronic Transfer Associates, Inc. (ETA). Lybrand,
formerly known as Peter C. Tosto, was enjoined by the Court in this case
in March 2002, and is serving an 87-month prison sentence for crimes he
committed in connection with the manipulation, among other things. The
complaint alleged that beginning in March 1998, Lybrand arranged to
acquire Polus, Citron, and ETA from the Kerns and Wilkins, who
controlled virtually all of the issued and outstanding shares of the
shell corporations. Instead of collecting their sale price directly
from Lybrand, the complaint alleged that the Kerns and Wilkins agreed to
accumulate their sale price by selling a small percentage of their
shares into the public market. Since there was not an active trading
market for the securities, Lybrand created an artificial market by
orchestrating a series of matched trades in which the Kerns and Wilkins
sold their shares to other parties at prices fixed by Lybrand. The
complaint further alleged that Lybrand also created interest in the
stocks by issuing misleading press releases. Lybrand's manipulation of
the securities market caused the stock prices of each corporation to
increase dramatically. Finally, the complaint alleged that after the
Kerns and Wilkins had accumulated their sale price, they transferred to
Lybrand the balance of the shares that they owed him and then continued
to sell their remaining shares into the market at artificially inflated
prices, realizing total illegal profits of about $6 million before the
Commission suspended trading in the securities on Jan. 29, 1999.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of NASD Regulation, Inc., in
this matter. For further background information, please see Litigation
Release No. 16448 (Feb. 24, 2000) and Litigation Release No. 16064 (Feb.
18, 1999). [SEC v. Peter C. Lybrand f/k/a Peter C. Tosto, Richard S.
Kern, Donald R. Kern, Charles Wilkins, Admiral Investments Ltd.,
Compulink International Corp., Drawbridge Investments Ltd., Glittergrove
Investments Ltd., Grafton Investments Ltd., Greenford Investments Ltd.,
McDonalds Ltd., Oasis Enterprises Ltd., Investor Relations, Inc.,
Tellerstock, Inc., Conversant Enterprises, Inc., EFI Corp. a/k/a
Electronic Funds, Inc., Barclay Bankcard, Inc., Canyon Vista Corp., and
Salteaux Ltd. a/k/a First American Security Corp. a/k/a First American
Securities Corp., Defendants, and Hannah G Irrevocable Trust and Hannah
R Trust, Relief Defendants, U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York, 00 Civ. 1387 (SHS)] (LR-18448)