Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandeep who wrote (87006)	6/27/2002 5:00:05 AM
From: nsumir81	Respond to of 99280

da_chief followers...here?

To: sandeep who wrote (87006)	6/27/2002 7:55:39 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 99280

Sandeep, Getting bin laden will cause a big up day. Karzi, afgan pm, said we would have him by 9/11/02. My initial reaction was what does he know? But in reflecting further, i think Kerry was right and we missed an opportunity early on to get him but now we are focused in on this as Job #1 even as we threaten iraq. Threatening Iraq may be a calculated diversion of attention from a big move we might make in AfganiPakistan border area. India/Pak tensions seem to have cooled. Unlike arafart, musharrif seems quite resolute in his pro-US position. He walks a tightrope over there. Just yesterday there was talk of a terrorist roundup in Pakistan. I have a positive feeling about South Asia stability(unlike the middle east) because in the end leaders of both india and pakistan are reasonable in the same sense that US/USSR avoided war particularly after Cuban Missile crisis. Perhaps what just happened was their Cuban Missile crisis. mike