SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Vet who wrote (25550)6/27/2002 10:20:33 AM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 27311
 
Thanks, the Vet. I had always thought that short interest was reported as of the 10th of the month. And I share the same peeve about delayed reporting.

Given that it is as of the 14th, I am completely befuddled about the rise in the short interest. I certainly expected a substantial decline given (1) the low stock price, (2) most of the short interest was accumulated at far higher prices...there is only a little more blood they can possibly squeeze out of the VLNC turnip, (3) the 3 million share day on S&P delisting day (June 12) provided the kind of selling volume into which the shorts could have easily covered.



To: The Vet who wrote (25550)6/27/2002 12:31:40 PM
From: John Curtis  Respond to of 27311
 
The Vet:

Which brings up one of my pet beefs. Why is short interest only compiled monthly and then only published almost 2 weeks later when it is almost useless?

HERE, HERE! I'm in complete agreement. To my mind there's absolutely no reason it cannot be done...excepting it must obviously be to someone's advantage not to......(but there I go being all paranoid again, VBG).

John~



To: The Vet who wrote (25550)6/28/2002 5:02:47 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Respond to of 27311
 
Vet, I agree with you, in this era of "better corporate disclosure", only the exchanges are keeping us like mushrooms (feeding us "S$%^t" and keeping us in the dark), there is absolutely no reason that each tic should not be marked as short or long. How do we get congress and the SEC to move on that? I have been "complaining" about that issue for more than two years now (g).

Zeev