SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tcmay who wrote (167194)6/28/2002 12:46:40 AM
From: tcmay  Respond to of 186894
 
"Well, I did know Albert. I worked for him in the early 80s, and then had some contact with him in the mid-80s, as I was leaving Intel. Just so there's no confusion, I was one level removed from working for him."

In the interests of accuracy, and for the couple of you who can actually remember all of these things, I also worked under him in 1975-76.

--Tim May



To: tcmay who wrote (167194)6/28/2002 7:02:21 AM
From: Amy J  Respond to of 186894
 
Hi Tim, Albert Yu was incredibly hardworking, very smart, and remarkably honest, but you could go to any Silicon Valley party awhile ago and hear the incredibly vocal complaints regarding a project that could have almost taken the Intel of today down. He wasn't directly in charge of this project, but he had the misfortune of managing the exec who was, that apparently kept him out of the loop by months. This particular exec is no longer at Intel, but he managed to fool the VCs into thinking he was a good exec, went to a startup and got it funded (ironically, most likely on the basis of his title at Intel, so-called window dressing for vc's), and is now competing with Intel. (I'm not worried about his company, their valuation is getting lower, it'll probably whither out in a couple of years, but of course, probably after he has had a chance to run safely to a different startup after securing capital from a different set of VCs.) Self-promotion to VCs to the point of lying is not only considered acceptable by some self-promoters, but also by some powerful high-tech investors and directors. Hopefully, companies will be motivated to start giving courses on ethics and the value of it.

Cheating starts in school. 50% of all Palo Alto high school students cheat on their homework to get ahead in school, per a contact of mine did who did a survey. The school doesn't have any serious recourse, so everyone does it. It's not good, because this will breed a bad batch of executives.

Here's another thing: just take a look at yesterday's SJMN, they had an article where they casually mentioned a VC firm that picked up and read the biz plans of their portfolio's competitor (the writer didn't even see anything wrong with that.) I once had a biz plan of a competitor of ours, forwarded to me by someone whose integrity I now question as a result. (And no, I did not read the plan.)

Regards,
Amy J