Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: reaper who wrote (176170)	6/28/2002 12:18:45 PM
From: Israel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

any particular reason for the strength in ACF and COF today??.. or just your everyday 'squeeze the shorts' thing again??<gg> Israel

To: reaper who wrote (176170)	6/28/2002 12:38:27 PM
From: Giordano Bruno	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

>>>nobody forced you to buy WCOM, arse-hole; look in the god-damn mirror when apportioning blame.<<< I've never owned WCOM. GFY.

To: reaper who wrote (176170)	6/28/2002 3:43:06 PM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Reaper: A few years ago, I called a bullish analyst and carefully laid out how the company's execs were pulling off an (admittedly) brilliant scam. At the end of the conversation, her only remark was "It is not my job to question audited financials". My response to her borders on the non-repeatable but paraphrased I suggested that ALL good scams include audited financials. She hung up and a week later reiterated her "Strong Buy". Best, Earlie