Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (15839)	6/28/2002 1:01:35 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"This is not a absolute religious requirement but a cultural adaptation to enable a more righteous life. A large percentage of people who cover like this do see it as a religious requirement. Of course Muslims who don't cover, see it as cultural adaptation. Everyone else interprets it according to their own utility. ". I also think that if she has an accident because her field of vision was limited, she shouldn't try to avoid accountability for it." No question about it. If you can demonstrate that this creates a safety issue then there is no arguement about driving. However, this same type of argument was used to keep women from certain carriers until it was shown to be unfounded. The issue at this point is still ID, right?