Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (176228)	6/28/2002 2:13:59 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

yeah.. they finally caught up with reaper's morning post.

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (176228)	6/28/2002 3:05:29 PM
From: orkrious	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

It's all good... with all the shit going on, that comment is amazing.

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (176228)	6/28/2002 3:34:33 PM
From: reaper	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

told ya Message 17669597 i don't think CCU's next. i cleared yesterday. over-valued, maybe, but i don't think there's anything 'nefarious' going on there. could be wrong, of course. but they did generate $400mm of operating cash in the Q1 and I think damn close to $300mm of that was free cash after capex and acquisitions. (and again i'm talking cash flow after interest payments and taxes here, not some "EBITDA" bullsh8t). the Mays family doesn't strike me as bad people. so far pretty much only managers i pretty much regarded as scumbags have been "exposed"; it would really surprise me if something untoward were going on at CCU. but then again, i'm the same guy who believes the ORCL financial statements and Jeff Henley, so I'm probably no better than that Tom Brown guy <g> Cheers