SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (88430)6/29/2002 12:59:58 AM
From: thecalculator  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
All right, 1st point:

1) CORV is trading @ 50% of its 'Bottom Line Value per Share'.

Before we go any further, I challenge anyone that contributes to this thread, or any lurker for that matter, that can find any tech stock (i.e., growth stock) that trades at 50% or less of its 'Bottom Line Value per Share', as computed according to the simple and conservative SBSR method described here:
Message 17672602

You are going to find out just how rare that is. <g>



To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (88430)6/29/2002 1:06:01 AM
From: thecalculator  Respond to of 99280
 
<<EDIT: For comparison, LU comes in at worse than negative $3/share>>

Of course, negative 'Bottom Line Value per Share' numbers go into the roundfile for our discussion. We are only interested in positive (i.e., >0) 'Bottom Line Value per Share' numbers

and ideally, we are interested in stocks that are trading at some fraction (<100%) of their 'Bottom Line Value per Share'.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News