SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : World Affairs Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (4)6/29/2002 10:15:41 AM
From: goldsnow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3959
 
Unlike Israel which was founded on the sectarian ideology of Zionism, that privileged Jews and Judaic religion and culture over other belief-systems of the Middle East, India was not founded on any such narrow and limiting ideology. Unlike Israel, which unabashedly defends the rights of Jews over all others, India (as a state) has never claimed religious exclusivism for it's Hindu citizens. >>>>>

Right. Except Muslims, not Hindu claim Religious Purity or at the minimum a submission of others. And unabashedly defends the rights of Muslims over all others- (in Kashmir, and in most other places) Plus Purity is a matter of survival for Israel, but not Kashmir



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (4)6/29/2002 10:21:23 AM
From: goldsnow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3959
 
Unlike Israel which was founded on the sectarian ideology of Zionism, that privileged Jews and Judaic religion and culture over other belief-systems of the Middle East, India was not founded on any such narrow and limiting ideology. Unlike Israel, which unabashedly defends the rights of Jews over all others, India (as a state) has never claimed religious exclusivism for it's Hindu citizens. >>>>

Did help India anyway, ah? Care to speculate why?



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (4)6/29/2002 7:27:09 PM
From: Frederick Smart1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3959
 
ChinuSFO...

>>Why was the US intervention in the India Pakistan situation a success and why has US not yet succeeded in the Israeli-Palestenian situation? Is US' taking sides with Israel serving as a barrier to peace in the region? It is about time that US leaders free themselves of any bondage and act freely and fearlessly. Here is a good perspective of the two situations.

There is much talk about the Arabs in Israel being all that prosperous. Well, is the Israeli political system set up such that the Israeli Arab can rise to occupy the highest office in the land?

Kashmir is not Palestine, India is not Israel>>

Thanks for sharing this!

119293