SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (268315)6/29/2002 3:27:07 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769669
 
So do you still stand by y our words. #reply-17672827 Why, then, do people
on this very thread continue to say that Bill Clinton was guilty of crimes? Was Clinton even indicted for anything? Wasn't he acquitted in his impeachment trial?

Well he lied under oath. He was impeached which is indicted for lying under oath. and other crimes. In his trial he testified he did not lie under oath. Democrats agreed that he did not lie under oath. His later deal where he admitted lying under oath shows he lied again under oath during his impeachment trial.

He is a rapist of at least one woman. The evidence is overwhelming, but the statue of limitations has expired. It would appear the democrat senators can be fooled by a guy who smoked but did not inhale and was caught in a lie by bodily fluids often used to convict rapists. If the democrat senators were fooled by this obvious lie then their judgement or dishonesty on all the other counts, crimes also is impeached. By the majority of Senators not fooled by the stupidest that ever was lies under oath, the stupidest that ever was was convicted of all crimes for which he was indicted, impeached and that is by more than 12 people.

But I'm glad the dems knew how stupid sore loser was and prevented such from becoming President. So maybe we can say dem senators are not stupid liars but patriots.

This logic makes your statement above make you appear kinda stupid.

It would also appear again you think in a very shallow manner.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: Cogito who wrote (268315)6/29/2002 10:39:04 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
Glad you agree with me.

Clinton's a scumbag. And his true legacy came home to roost on 9/11.

JLA