SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (16028)6/29/2002 5:49:21 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
I should mention the social compact we have with the aggrieved, who renounce private vengeance on the assumption that the state will be diligent in meting out justice. Continue down a path of "no fault" criminality, where responsibility is limited and treated much like civil liability, and we disdain to punish, and the social compact will be violated, and the aggrieved will seek their own vengeance once again........


Are you so sure? As with any change of paradigm, the change period would be brutal. But once we were operating under the new system and kids had been raised under that system, do you really think that people would want to give up their opportunity to seek redress and reparations from their attacker in exchange for the warm glow of knowing that he was rotting in jail watching TV for ten to twenty?



To: Neocon who wrote (16028)6/29/2002 5:55:49 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
<<She can argue that she had no choice due to the effects of living with continual terror, under a diminished capacity theory (something like "battered wives syndrome").>>

That one gets overdone.