Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (16098)	6/30/2002 1:57:38 AM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

$250k should get them someone who will stay awake and maybe some PI work. Hey, Ish, you just cut their allowance in half! And you explained about the reason for the change in payment, and it's a good one, and that the rich would as usual have no upper limit on what they could spend on their defense against death, but you didn't comment on this: Wondering what the dollar limit should be on the prosecution. Just curious. Also interested in what penalties you would propose for those involved in prosecutions that resulted in either the death of an innocent or an unconstitutional execution. Capital punishment, heavy fines, loss of job and pension, no protection from suit in civil court by survivors of the wrongfully executed, or what?