Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (52091)	6/30/2002 12:50:22 AM
From: average joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Gilda Lerner is an acknowledged expert. Her statement speaks for itself. Further proof is not required. You said as follows: In the dark ages almost no one got educated- and certainly not women. Wrong again. I provided proof from Gilda Lerner as follows: (Lerner 6). For instance, during the Dark Ages women enjoyed wider literacy and access to education than men did, so the Dark Ages were probably only Dark for men. No doubt the book you are hiding was written by a man. (Lerner). If we are to adequately study the lives of women, we must be prepared to develop new ways of defining their experiences that are not based upon a male-oriented world view. To make matters worse you brought a red herring to the table in the form of black history, here: This will amuse you AJ- your women's history page is not unlike those very odd scholars of black history who would like to make us believe that blacks accounted for as many discoveries as whites, and were, at the same time, disadvantaged Can't one be disadvantaged and make discoveries to?