Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (268450)	6/30/2002 2:25:03 AM
From: calgal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

This is a neat 4th of July site! Please visit this awesome site at www.OurChristianNation.org/july4th.htm

To: Cogito who wrote (268450)	6/30/2002 11:41:45 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Well, allen lots of words and opinions. but you still seem unable to address the points of my post. Allen I have seen you try to offer real logic and rational arguments here. Now I have seen many who when they run out of arguments and see they have lost switch the subject. I must admit that your switch was elegant. And by the way, a biased person is a shallow thinking person. So my direct words to you you are really saying back to me. Can you see the logic of what I just said. But bias also may imply a possible dishonesty. I try to speak directly and not imply anything. To this point, my commentary has pointed out what I consider your failings in that effort. I do not consider saying or making the observation that you are thinking in a shallow manner is name calling. I speak directly and bluntly. I stick to the issue or topic. So I don't see any wrong or non rational bias in the post you are responding to. So I will repeat each paragraph and ask you so show me where I am biased. I do have a set of rules I live by, a set of beliefs. These belief logically dictate certain methods of analysis and certain perspectives which you may call bias. So in my last post show me how I am biased. Don't just motor mouth saying it. In fact my first paragraph is really speaking about bias. In analysis, What is wrong with this proffer. It is not my particular belief or your particular belief. It's what main stream Christian belief is. And the issue is would a reasonable person who knows the dialects of Christian beliefs reasonably conclude the meaning or interpretation of all of Rev Falwells words were correctly reported by Ms Coulter. This proffer. If it is a reasonable interpretation then those who know this and attack are dishonest and are what Ms Coulter calls main stream liberals and I call smear mongering vacant liberal minded lefty loons. This proffer. Those who don't understand are just your basic vacant liberal minded lefty loons. Ms Coulter's stupid liberals. These are observation that summarize what I have seen. In the body of your posts and the ever shallow thinking I see in them is leading me to move you into that classification. I take my time in making conclusions and give others a chance several times to show me I'm wrong. Mr Rexley I've observed conducts himself in a similar manner as well as several others on this thread. The last paragraph is a summary of how I conduct myself. I also state the obvious of the human condition. If you break down to name calling by your definition, not mine you have little character. I observe that you posts indicate what if any logic or critical thinking ability you have. I then poke fun and suggest I have not found much logic of rationale in you posts so far. But I point out directly and immediately stupid or shallow thinking and question all proffers and facts. Your character by your reaction is tested as well as your ability to add 2 + 2. I do seem to see many sums of 1 and 3 and even some 5s LOL.... Ann Coulter does an amazing job of pointing out the stupidity and lies of what is main stream liberal thinking and expression and beliefs today. If you cannot see the logic in Ms Coulters arguments, well maybe it's because you lack the ability to think that deeply. You bias prevents you from getting out of the box of ideas you are stuck in. tom watson tosiwmee