Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marek_wojna who wrote (20671)	7/2/2002 4:56:15 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

<US will kill the free trade the very moment they realize they are about to lose. Look at garlic from China - there is 386% duty on the product which in China is produced with very intensive human labour, in the US on the state of the art farms in best possible climate in the world. Still Californians cannot compete. > Well Marek, the trend is for the USA to abandon their cant about free trade, human rights and all that jazz they harangue others about and head for the Albanian/North Korean isolationist backward system. Hopefully they won't go far on that trend. Steel, farm protection, garlic, timber, sheep .... <Most of these people cannot solve their problems by having computers, or cellphones. What they really need is higher commodity prices, less corrupt politicians, power to impose same tariffs as US to stimulate regional production > Everyone benefits from computers and cellphones, even if indirectly. Almost everyone has a need to communicate and cellphones are a great way of talking to people. Cellphones don't do everything, but they help with a lot of things. Higher commodity prices can't be ordained. Commodity prices are a function of production cost. OPEC tries to ordain commodity prices, but they can't [other than in the short term until competitors boost production]. Tariffs don't stimulate regional production; they shift regional production from sensible products and services to uneconomic ones which would be bought elsewhere but for artificial barriers to trade, thereby reducing efficiency and the economic position of the 'protected' country. Mqurice