Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Have you read your constitution today? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (20)	7/1/2002 7:31:50 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 403

Only if you think he did what you think he did. I accept that you think he did what you think he did. I never saw it as that. So for me, others have done exactly what Mr. CH has done. He treated me, for example, to some very bad behavior indeed- but no worse than how JLA has treated me in the past, and several other people. If JLA is being semi-civil I see no reason not to talk to him. Same goes for CH. If a whole group of people wanted to persecute JLA, for behavior perceived as criminal, I would probably even stick up for him- if I had seen no evidence of TOU violation or criminal behavior (of course he might not want me to, but I would do it anyway). I've said this many times. I can say it 100 more, but I don't think you will be able to see what I mean. I understand what you think you saw, but I do not agree with your perception. And I accept that. I understand if you cannot accept it. I've seen some rhetoric I do NOT understand, and some posts that are not comprehensible to me. But I accept they grow out of an alternate perception of what has happened on SI.