SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dorine Essey who wrote (2296)7/3/2002 4:24:39 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
***Enron Documents Get National Security Treatment

Deregulated, Deceptive & Now, Deadly

dailyenron.com

JUNE 5: The White House was successful yesterday in assuring that none of the 2,100 pages of documents relating to administration contacts with Enron become public.
While complying with a Senate subpoena to gather all such documents, the administration held them hostage for an additional day, refusing to give Senate investigators physical custody until a plan was in place to assure only a handful of people would ever see them.

The security agreement is unusual and contains provisions normally reserved only for national security inquiries such as those that are underway in the Senate now over the 9/11 intelligence failures.

Under the agreement that freed the Enron documents from a locked room in the Old Executive Office Building, only a limited number of committee staff will have access to the room and those who do must sign confidentiality agreements.

It was reportedly not just the Bush administration that was anxious to keep the documents out of the public eye. The administration was also reportedly acting on behalf of Enron officials who had objected strenuously to handing over the documents to Lieberman's committee.

In a final concession to the White House, and in order to move the investigation forward, the chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., provided the White House with his personal promise to protect the documents by imposing "extraordinary security precautions" -- including keeping them in a locked room equipped with an alarm.

The last-minute gambit was the final delaying tactic in a months-long cat and mouse game between the administration and Lieberman's committee. The White House employed a number of strategies over the months to avoid releasing documentation of its contacts with Enron officials before and during that company's collapse last December.

Its initial response to a letter from Lieberman requesting the documents was to circulate a simple questionnaire within the Executive Branch asking about Enron contacts. When Lieberman rejected the move as grossly inadequate and subpoenaed the documents the White House tried to satisfy the Senator with a summary of meetings to the committee 24-hours later.

In that summary the administration admitted that Enron chairman Kenneth Lay had made a series of telephone calls to members of the Bush Cabinet, including Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Commerce Secretary Don Evans, as the company sank toward collapse last fall.

Lieberman rejected the summary as inadequate as well and continued to push for compliance with his committee's subpoena.

Finally, with the security agreement in place the documents, filling one box and one large folder, were transferred to the committee early last night, after the panel's noon deadline had passed.

White House officials said the documents comprised "an initial response" to the two subpoenas the committee issued on May 22. While the agreement covers employees of both President Bush and Vice President Cheney's offices, neither of the chief executives' own meeting notes or documentation are covered by the subpoena.

"I'm pleased the White House has begun to deliver the documents I believe are necessary to conduct a complete investigation into the government's oversight of Enron," Lieberman said in a statement. "Thousands upon thousands of people have lost savings, pensions and jobs, and the U.S. economy has suffered a severe loss of confidence. I look forward to determining what, if anything, the federal government might have done differently to avoid these problems."

Meanwhile, the General Accounting Office, Congress' investigative arm, is still waiting for documents it subpoenaed last February containing the names of Enron officials and other oil companies who met last year with the vice president's energy task force. The GAO has sued for release of the documents.

Enron officials played key roles in the formation of the administration's national energy policy. When those policies were unveiled last year they contained several policy initiatives either sought by or helpful to Enron and its business practices, such as deregulating energy markets and opposing electricity price caps in Western states.

Enron and former Chairman Ken Lay were also major financial contributors to Bush's 2000 presidential campaign. Documents previously released by the White House detail at least 24 separate contacts with Enron officials through personal meetings, letters or phone calls.

---------------------------------------------
Deregulated, Deceptive and Deadly
Another executive of a troubled Houston oil company has apparently committed suicide in the wake of disclosures that his company had participated in bogus energy trades similar to those of its Houston cousin, Enron.
El Paso Corp. senior vice president and treasurer Charles D. Rice, 47, was found dead Sunday, in what police are calling "an apparent suicide."

Rice had worked for the energy company for 25 years.

In January, a month after Enron collapsed into bankruptcy, Enron Corp. vice chairman J. Clifford Baxter was found dead in his car in Sugarland, Texas, a suburb of Houston. Baxter's death was ruled a suicide.

Just as with Enron's Baxter, Rice's death comes amid turmoil in the energy sector over allegedly bogus trades and accounting. Federal regulators are investigating power swaps between energy traders that artificially boosted trading volume and created false revenue on the company's books.

El Paso was in the midst of this controversy when, last week, as part of the restructuring, the company said it would eliminate about 300 jobs within its energy trading unit and reform its financial reporting.

Dynegy Inc., Reliant Resources Inc., and CMS Energy have all acknowledged using such trades, which boost a company's trading volume but bring in no income. Last month, the chairman and chief executives of Dynegy and CMS both resigned.

The turmoil currently rocking the energy sector, critics say, is a direct result of nearly 20 years of industry-inspired deregulation. Beginning in the administration of the current President's father, George H. Bush, energy interests have chipped away at federal, state and public utility regulations.

During President H. Bush's administration the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) was chaired by the wife of Texas Senator Phil Gramm. During the last months of her tenure at FERC Wendy Gramm pushed through a controversial rollback of FERC regulations and oversights of energy derivative trading by companies like Enron. When Wendy Gramm left FERC she was hired as a member of Enron's board of directors.

The pace of energy deregulation picked up markedly after the GOP swept control of the House of Representatives in 1994. Deregulation was a centerpiece of the GOP's so-called "Contract With America." Campaign contributions jumped from energy companies to key GOP leaders, particularly the new House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, of Sugarland, Texas.

In return, energy deregulation became a virtual mantra of House Republicans who promised it would bring lower energy prices and more abundant supplies. Rep. DeLay became such a cheerleader for energy deregulation it earned him the nickname "The Senator from Enron" among his House colleagues.

The promise of low prices and abundant energy never materialized. What we got instead was a replay of what happened twenty years earlier with a similar campaign contribution-fueled deregulation of the savings and loan industry.

Just as the S&L high-flyers did before them, rather than use the freedom afforded by regulatory relief to become more efficient and productive, energy executives turned instead to deception and fraud. With their regulatory "cops" out of the way it simply became easier to cheat than play by the few remaining rules.

We can only imagine the pressures that higher-ups put on men like Baxter and Rice that haunted them enough to take their own lives. Their deaths are tragedies for their families. The reprehensible behavior of their deregulated companies who threatened critical energy supplies and bilked ratepayers is another expensive lesson in deregulation. The resulting bankruptcies, cutbacks and layoffs now hitting these deregulated companies and the ensuing losses of worker pensions, savings, and jobs, are devastating for their communities. But, above all, it's the unrepentant complicity of those in Congress who aided and abetted in this latest fleecing of America, by gutting the regulatory apparatus, that's a national tragedy - and contemptible.



To: Dorine Essey who wrote (2296)7/10/2002 6:44:22 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
Exhume The Body?

SEC Harken Investigation - a New Look?
The Daily Enron
7/08/02

While the President went fishing in Maine over July 4th, it was a working weekend for White House staffers. It seems that a scruffy flock of old Texas chickens came home to roost in the executive branch and staffers spent the weekend trying to round them up.

Long believed safely buried a decade ago, President Bush's Harken Energy stock deals now threaten to implicate the President in the very corporate misbehavior he was planning to criticize in a major policy address tomorrow.

So, supporters of the President fanned out to the weekend talk shows, talking points in hand, hoping to blunt the case against their boss. Harken was a bogus issue, they claimed. They offered three reasons why we should not worry ourselves over Bush's Harken Energy deals:

Not-to-Worry Reason #1 - Bush's failure to notify the SEC for 34 weeks that he had sold his Harken stock was a simple mistake.

But, was it a "mistake" with a purpose? Timely reporting of the stock sale might have raised some potentially embarrassing questions at the time:
Bush sat on Harken's audit committee, which had learned by May 1990 that Harken was in deep financial doo-doo. The company would have to report a large loss that fall.
The company had mitigated a $23 million loss by cooking up a phony $10 million "sale" of a Harken subsidiary to some of Bush's fellow Harken insiders. The "sale" was financed by money borrowed from the company itself. (Later, the SEC forced Harken to reverse the transaction and claim the full loss.)
Curious journalists have a way of connecting dots that big when they involve a sitting President's son. By waiting 34 weeks before reporting his Harken stock, time and events would diminish the size of those dots, along with the curiosity to connect them.

Not-to-Worry Reason #2: Yes, Bush had served at the time on both Harken's board and its audit committee, but he was out of the loop. He was not aware that consultants at Smith Barney, who had been hired by the audit committee and were working for them, had discovered that the company was $150 million in debt and would lose $23 million that year.

Well, maybe if Bush had only held a seat on Harken's board this excuse would have some degree of plausibility since it might be argued that the audit committee's findings had not been presented to the board before Bush dumped his stock. But Bush also sat seat on Harken's audit committee, which had been tasked by the board earlier in the year to work on a restructuring plan for troubled Harken. As part of his service on the audit committee Bush would have certainly been privy to the earliest discussions and drafts of that report.

If Bush's excuse is that he was not paying attention, had not read the reports, or had not been consistently AWOL from audit committee meetings, how does that square with his current position holding board members accountable?

What is missing is testimony under oath - what did Bush know, and when did he know it before dumping his stock? (See chart in Featured Content on our homepage.)

Not-to-Worry Reason #3 - The SEC investigated the whole Harken matter in 1990 and found no reason to pursue it.

True, as far as it goes. But take a closer look and this reason loses all its luster.

At the time of the SEC investigation, Richard Breeden was SEC Commissioner. Breeden was appointed to his point by President George H. Bush. Then he was asked to investigate the boss's son. (Previously Breeden had served in the Reagan/Bush administration as deputy White House counsel for Vice President Bush.)

The SEC's General Counsel was James R. Doty. In private life Doty had been the accused's attorney.Among other things, Doty had negotiated Bush's acquisition of the Texas Rangers baseball team. Letting Doty investigate this transaction was as if the Clinton administration had tasked then Deputy Attorney General Webster Hubble to investigate the Whitewater transaction.

The SEC quickly slammed the coffin lid shut on the investigation - without interviewing a single Harken board member. And there it has lain buried ever since - case closed.

All this raises an inevitable question: Why shouldn't the Harken case be exhumed for a full independent autopsy?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harken and Arthur Andersen - Kissin' Cousins?
It was all in the family for Harken Energy and Arthur Andersen. Harken drew its top layer of executives directly from Arthur Andersen.

Harken's CEO, Mikel D. Faulkner had been employed by Arthur Andersen in its energy audit division - the same division that later audited Enron. Anna M. Williams, Harken's Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer also worked in Andersen's energy audit division, as a senior auditor.

Bruce N. Huff, Harken's President, Chief Operating Officer, had worked in Andersen's audit division as had Wayne Hennecke, Harken's Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Accounting Officer.

When Harken Energy had to select an outside auditor they selected Arthur Andersen. And it was Andersen auditors who sanctified Harken's books in 1989 when the company arranged the phony $10 million sale of a subsidiary to Harken insiders - financed entirely by a loan from the company.

So, it would seem that long before he became America's CEO, President Bush had enjoyed a front row seat from which to observe the very accounting problems he now condemns.

-----------------------------------------------
Quote of the Day

"To compare a $12 million sale of a subsidiary company by Harken to a deliberate attempt (by Worldcom) to hide $3.8 billion in losses is ridiculous."

-White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett.

dailyenron.com