Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (16444)	7/2/2002 3:03:19 PM
From: Constant Reader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Time for you to take an Ativan, I think. ;-)

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (16444)	7/2/2002 3:07:16 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I oppose them. They will result in widespread intrustion of government in the religious sector, cause overcrowding in some schools and underutilization in others, be unfair to the poor since they will continue to do on average less well in school than the rich, and generally muck up a system that is perfectly capable of mucking itself up without the help of vouchers. Oh wait, I'm for them. Better let somebody else answer that one.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (16444)	7/2/2002 3:15:07 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21057

I oppose them. Not philosophically, but pragmatically. There is no way the bureaucrats wouldn't screw it up.