SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1275)7/3/2002 3:46:32 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
The hypocrite in chief

President Bush is talking tough about pinstriped rip-off artists -- ignoring the skeletons in his and Cheney's own corporate closets.

salon.com

* If anyone has the premium Salon service please post the full article...=)



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1275)7/3/2002 3:50:53 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Where Are Burton and DeLay on Halliburton?

Administration Mauled by Own Dog

dailyenron.com

Of Double Standards
JULY 1: Remember Whitewater - that two-bit, failed Arkansas real estate deal that dominated much of the Clinton's eight years in the White House? Republicans felt it represented such a serious ethical marker that it required six years of investigating costing some $65 million.
Back then, GOP leaders like Dan Burton and Tom DeLay regularly climbed in front of TV cameras and worked themselves up into moralistic hissy fits over Whitewater. They justified their non-stop investigations by saying that a President who conducted himself badly in business was capable of, well, who knows what!

While Bill Clinton is gone, Dan Burton and Tom DeLay are still in office. But their views on business ethics must have softened. We have heard nary a peep out of either man about the current Vice President's now suspect behavior while CEO of Halliburton (1995-2000.) Halliburton is under SEC investigation for cooking its books, a la Enron, under Cheney's command.

The money involved in the Whitewater deal would not have been enough to buy a fixer-upper in Hope, Arkansas. But the Halliburton deals now under investigation can be measured in the tens of millions of dollars.

So, where is the outrage? Maybe it's "different." Let's see:

- Clinton's Whitewater business deal occurred before he was elected President
- Cheney's Halliburton deals occurred before he was elected Vice President

Check.

- The accounting for Clinton's Whitewater loans raised questions
- Halliburton's accounting methods under Cheney have raised questions

Check.

- The Whitewater loans to Clinton were part of a regulatory (S&L) investigation
- Halliburton's financial statements are part of a regulatory (SEC) investigation

Check.

- During Whitewater, Republicans argued that Executive Branch agencies could not be trusted to investigate their own boss.
- SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt, a Bush/Cheney appointee, is now investigating Halliburton and its former accounting firm, Arthur Andersen. (Andersen was one of Pitt's law clients before he was appointed to the SEC.)

Check.

- The Clintons lost money on the Whitewater deal.

- Cheney profited handsomely since his salary and bonuses were based on Halliburton's now-suspect financial statements.
No Check. Except for Dick Cheney - who received very large bonus checks for what is now alleged to have been artificially inflated Halliburton profits.

So, some enterprising reporter might want to ask Dan Burton and Tom DeLay to explain the differences - as they see them - between Whitewater and Halliburton.

-------------------------------------------------
Of Dogs and Fleas
Suddenly, the Bush administration finds itself scrambling to contain the bonfires of corporate vanity breaking out all around them. To listen to the President over the past few days you would think the fire started by accident. But, in fact, it was a disaster that has been in the making for eight years.
The fuel for this fire began building in 1994 with the GOP's so-called "Contract With America" which sparked an aggressive and careless deregulation of critical private sector industries.

When George W. Bush was elected President, those same forces moved into the Executive Branch. Just months ago this administration granted many of the very same companies unprecedented access to the regulatory buttons and levers of government. Some of the same now-disgraced CEO's were even granted White House posts during the transition. Later these companies and CEO's were called upon to help draft industry-friendly regulations for such critical agencies as the SEC and FCC, as well as the Treasury and Energy Departments.

From the very beginning, public interest groups have complained that the administration was way too cozy with industry. But when the administration was asked to reassure them that nothing untoward was afoot, the administration responded by blocking access to the records of those meetings - not only for the public, but also from Congress and the General Accounting Office.

Now the administration is reaping the whirlwind for its unquestioned trust in men like Enron's Kenneth Lay and Arthur Andersen's CEO Joseph Berardino, both of whom held transition team posts and helped fashion energy and accounting rules, respectively.

A timeless colloquialism applies here: "When you lay with dogs, you rise with fleas."

What you are seeing now is the Bush administration's reaction to a powerful itch, which would be poetic justice if it were not for the fact that innocent workers, retirees, and shareholders are getting bit as well.

-----------------------------------------
Quote of The Day
"We made such an incredible amount of money we didn't want to recognize it all into earnings. We were supposed to make $500 million in a quarter and we were doing it in a day."
A former Enron executive, speaking on condition of anonymity, on Enron's manipulation of its trading books



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1275)7/3/2002 4:19:35 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
CEOs Face Arrests, Lawsuits, Dismissals.

Consumer's Union Slams Deregulation

dailyenron.com

The Gang That Couldn't Manage Straight
JUNE 12: It seems that every morning's paper now heralds the arrest of another former corporate titan. This morning's offering to investor wrath was Sam Waksal, the former CEOof ImClone Systems Inc. Sam was arrested this morning by the FBI on insider trading charges.

Those executives not getting arrested find themselves under intense investor scrutiny. Those found wanting are being shown the door in record numbers. Last month alone there were 80 CEO "departures," according to outplacement firm Challenger Gray & Christmas.

Enron's collapse also awakened corporate boards of directors from their decade-long slumber. With news of Enron's board members getting sued by investors and images of them being grilled on TV by Congress, directors are calling in corporate executives and demanding straight answers. When those answers don't add up, executive heads are hitting the boardroom floor with a thud.

Last week it was Dennis Kozlowski's head that rolled. The former CEO of 277,000-employee Tyco International "resigned." The move came after Tyco's board was visited by New York state detectives investigating their CEO for sales tax evasion in New York. (Kozlowski was indicted shortly after his resignation last week on 11 felony counts, each punishable by up to four years in prison.).

Other recently departed former CEO darlings of Wall Street include John Rigas of Adelphia Communications, Bernard Ebbers of WorldCom, Steve Gardner of Peregrine Systems, Charles Conaway of Kmart, Joseph Berardino of Andersen and of course, Kenneth Lay and Mr Jeffrey Skilling of Enron fame.

So, you might wonder, what's going on here? Is this some kind of sociological sea-change within the corporate culture?

No, there's nothing new going on here. What we are seeing is just the latest reminder that, while Congress can repeal laws regulating certain industries, they cannot repeal the laws of human nature. Put enough people in positions where they can make easy money by cheating, lying and stealing, then remove outside oversight and a percentage of those people will succumb.

And, while the percentage who turn to the dark side might be small, the damage they can do within a free-market economy is enormous. In the 1980s probably fewer than 5% of all savings and loan owners were crooks, but those few used deregulation to bilk US taxpayers out of nearly half a trillion dollars. That industry was regulated and has been doing well ever since.

Conservatives that brought us savings and loan deregulation were among the same who, less than a decade later, pushed energy deregulation. And, now we know, the results have been much the same. Only this time it's not taxpayers, but investors, workers, and pensioners who will pay the price.

Which brings us to our second item today.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July Report Gives Deregulation a Failing Grade
This week the non-partisan Consumer's Union ripped the curtain back on deregulation and what they discovered was a far cry from the promised land of abundance, high quality, low prices and better than great customer service.
Instead, what CU says it found was that "broken promises, deceptive marketing, and dreadful service have become accepted business practices in an increasingly Wild West marketplace."

Energy deregulation is one of the areas explored in CU's July 2002 report. California ratepayers, the report points out, were among the first to discover that whatever small rate cuts resulted initially from that state's deregulation were dwarfed by the subsequent $10 billion in rate jumps and lost productivity caused by market manipulation and fraud by energy companies like Enron.

"Such shabby treatment stems in part from an economic experiment begun in the 1970s: deregulation," Consumer Union concluded. "It was supposed to cut prices, expand choice, enhance service-improve your life. So how come you're not smiling?"

Consumer's Union suggests that ratepayers worried about their state's energy deregulatory policies should visit the Energy Information Administration web site www.eia.doe.gov to determine if their state is deregulated, or heading that way. The site also provides links to information and to state public-utility-commission web sites.

The full text of the Consumer's Union eport can be accessed free online at:
consumersunion.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enron's Fired workers to get up to $13,500
Former Enron Corp. employees have reached a tentative agreement that could more than double the severance that some of the laid-off workers already have received. Under the proposed agreement, former workers who already have received $5,600 in severance could get an additional $7,900.
Not everyone is happy with the agreement, and some former employees are refusing to accept it. Those who decide to reject the severance package in order to preserve their right to future legal action will receive no additional payment.

For those who do sign, the agreement will result in two payments. The first payment would be for $2,000 and should arrive within 30 days of the court's approval.

The additional $7,900 that Enron's out-of-work employees receive would not be enough to buy many of the expensive castoff furnishings being sold off at Linda Lay's "Jus' Stuff' secondhand store. Linda, the wife of former Enron CEO Ken Lay, opened the little shop in a Houston suburb to unload surplus furnishing from the couples three Aspen, Colorado homes which they sold shortly after Enron's collapse.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lieberman Wants the Full Story
Senator Joe Lieberman does not ascribe to the theory that half a loaf is better than none. The head of a Senate panel investigating Enron asked for all White House documents showing administration contact with Enron executives. In response to two subpoenas Lieberman received about 2,500 pages of documents.
Now, he wants to know just when the White House is going to cough up the rest.

The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee "needs production to be complete soon" so it can complete its Enron investigation, chairman Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., said in a letter Monday to the White House counsels for President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Lieberman also now wants details relating to the gathering of the documents, including the status of questionnaires that White House attorneys had asked employees to fill out.

"The committee is trying hard to work with the White House in pursuit of our Enron investigation," Lieberman wrote. "However, we must balance your requests for accommodations with the committee's need to conduct its inquiry."

Obtaining the documents the committee needs to begin its investigation has been like getting information on weapons of mass destruction out of Iraq. The White House refused earlier requests out of hand and only began to produce documents when Lieberman used his committee's subpoena powers last month.

Lieberman's committee voted along party lines to issue Congress' first subpoenas to the Bush White House. Republicans on the committee supported White House attempts to block access the documents. There were at least 60 Enron-related meetings and phone calls involving presidential aides.

It had already been learned that Enron chairman Kenneth Lay made a series of telephone calls to members of the Bush Cabinet, including Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Commerce Secretary Don Evans, as the company sank toward collapse last fall.

The General Accounting Office, Congress' investigative arm, sued Cheney in February to force release of the names of figures from Enron and other oil companies who met last year with the vice president's energy task force.

Quote of the Day
"Efforts at avoidance and evasion of (corporate) tax liability are so widespread and so amazing both in their boldness and ingenuity that further action without delay seems imperative."

Henry Morgenthau's 1937 memo to President Franklin Roosevelt regarding offshore corporate tax avoidance. Henry Morgenthau Jr. was Roosevelt's Treasury Secretary. Henry is the father of current New York City's 82-year old corporate crime fighting District Attorney, Robert Morgenthau.

------------------------------------------
Got Thoughts?
Email them to us so we can share them with others.
Editor@thedailyenron.com