Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Palestinian Hoax -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (632)	7/3/2002 10:56:29 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3467

Lorne, Noel has erred. I was the one who said it. Message 17693007 BTW, thanks that Canadian oil link.

To: lorne who wrote (632)	7/4/2002 8:27:00 AM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3467

Re: "you're the one...or explain what you mean.", my error, got your post mixed up with another's. No, I never said "You said the muslims attacked the USA because they were in saudia arabia so of course my question is relevant. If it is not relevant then perhaps your original statement really does not exist or should not exist." I said "Al-Qaeda attacked NYC because they are fanatics who hate the USA for being in Saudi Arabia and the Saudi power elite who are so corrupt." I would never say that Muslims attacked the USA. Such statements only serve to reinforce prejudice and therefore are not necessary. As to your last question I answered it with respect to the Chinese/Muslim example that you raised. I don't know enough about the India/Pakistan problem to comment on it. My superficial knowledge about it is that Kashmir was turned over to India because a Hindu maharajah was in power in an area where the majority was Muslim. But as I said I am not qualified to comment on this one.