SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (84216)7/4/2002 9:04:00 PM
From: hmalyRespond to of 275872
 
John Re... believe the reason for all this is that they will be the new Durons and their MHz will be compared to P4 Celerons. This eliminates the need to explain a big increase in IPC -- they are just being compared against much-slower-than-Northwood Celeron P4s.<<<<<<

Could be. I had read on AMDZONE or RWT that Barton was going to include some Hammer optimizations, which was the reason for the increase.



To: Petz who wrote (84216)7/7/2002 11:53:29 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Petz,

If 2 processors have the same QS ratings, say 2400, they should deliver roughly the same performance. If they don't, AMD will be opening itself to such an attack that the credibility of QS would collapse, and Barton would be advertised by its clock speed, not QS ratings by everybody selling it, which would be a blow AMD could never recover, and it would even threaten Hammer.

Joe