SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (52311)7/5/2002 9:11:29 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
How exactly is it insulting and ridiculous? What is the exact nature of the harm? You feel you are made to acknowledge the existence of a being who, in your opinion, does not exist? Is that it?

JLA



To: epicure who wrote (52311)7/5/2002 12:11:50 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I agree with that..

"Saying "under God" when one does not believe in God is insulting and ridiculous and is an affirmation of something in words, imo. It is equivalent to being made to say "under Santa", or "under Satan"- neither of which I happen to believe in, and having to pledge "under" either would insult me. "

However..

American history is replete with references to God, song, speeches, currency <g>...

I absolutely do not see any way to "sanitize" public utterance or records from references to God out of concern that a minority will be offended.

If someone attends a Fourth of July celebration and there is a rendering of "America The Beautiful" and some people are offended....my suggestion is it's a free country...start a "god-free" 4th of July celebration of their own.

I am more troubled by the Pledge of Allegiance because of the "coercive" nature of peer pressure and pressure of "authority" in public schools.

I would much rather see the students who want to recite the pledge go outside, maybe salute the flag (yes we still have them in our district at the public schools) and recite the pledge completely as a result of independent thinking and self motivation.

And if the "non-pledge" students (or their parents ) are offended....well I'm really sorry about that...

but

Too bad..

It *then* becomes a freedom of expression issue....

and to impose a further restriction would create an atmosphere which I consider to be the "tyranny of the minority".

Which I believe is oppressive AND unconstitutional.



To: epicure who wrote (52311)7/5/2002 1:25:55 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Saying "under God" when one does not believe in God is insulting and ridiculous
Then don't say it. Nobody is making you say it. You keep sliding over that point. But it's there. I have a right to say it and you have a right to not say it, so we are equally and should be equally content.



To: epicure who wrote (52311)7/5/2002 1:27:44 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Saying "under God" when one does not believe in God is insulting and ridiculous

What about saying "with liberty and freedom for all" when you know there are people in jail who don't have either liberty or freedom. Is it insulting and ridiculous to say that?