Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maried. who wrote (52375)	7/5/2002 5:01:12 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

it is more of a purported fact, or a "personal" fact, don't you think? As opposed to the kind of fact that is the same for everyone- such as, it is raining, or the temperature is 66 degrees.

To: maried. who wrote (52375)	7/5/2002 5:42:12 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The existence-status of that being is a fact that some do not acknowledge. Oh, my. Well. Hmmmm. That justifies a lot, no doubt about it. Too bad for me and mine, since you and yours have the Truth and we don't. I'm wondering: Does your "fact" about "that being" you believe in the existence of and I "refuse to acknowledge" exclude, for example, the possibility that the Hindu pantheon, ie not a being, but many of them, might be the correct concept, and that therefore those who insist there is "a" being are in error in a significant way? members.tripod.com IOW: does "a god of some kind" include with respect the possibility that there are multiple gods? There are 900 million Hindus, btw. Maybe some are lurking and might be interested to know. Is the "fact" monotheism, or is polytheism also a possibility?