SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D. Long who wrote (15768)7/6/2002 3:29:24 AM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
Your Exuberance Is Astonishing.

According to former United Nations Special Commission (Unscom) chief inspector Scott Ritter,
"[F]rom a qualitative standpoint, Iraq has been disarmed. Iraq today possesses no meaningful
weapons of mass destruction." While it is certainly possible that Iraq has the seed stock to rebuild
its purported arsenal, Ritter has said that Iraq does not currently possess the capability to produce
or deploy chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. (8)


Many other considerations here……….

nonviolence.org

And your argument well documented here………

american.edu

With some very ugly realities here that have many around the world expecting a better solution than war….

saveageneration.org

Regarding who or what is to blame is quite easy for you and I sitting comfortably at our keyboards.

We know Sadam and what HE is capable of , but must a country and its people be destroyed because we have suspicions that HE has WMD’s ?

Western powers have the capability to photograph and ascertain in great detail any WMD building or potential deployment , as was noted on the report on Israel having 400+++ nukes with now second strike capability.Yet, there has been absolutely no evidence presented of the same on Iraq. Why is that?

There is much more afoot than meets the eye, but if it were ascertained that Iraq did indeed have WMDs and a capacity to deploy them , most , including myself , would be resolute in disarming that threat.

So, answer the questions they want answered and lets get on with it.

Over....... <g>

KC



To: D. Long who wrote (15768)7/8/2002 1:23:33 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
Iraq is in violation of the cease fire agreement and the inspections regime set forth by the UNSC

Wrong. The inspections regime committed violations, and then left Iraq on their own accord.

Tom