To: TobagoJack who wrote (20818 ) 7/7/2002 3:16:51 AM From: Maurice Winn Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559 Jay, hello again. I expect interest rates to rise in the absence of inflation as measured by consumer price indices. The guiding factors are more likely to be: 1... Maintenance of US$ as the pre-eminent global currency Uncle Al will not allow the US$ to be relegated to an also-ran, which means returns on holders of US$ must be competitive with other financial transaction methods [such as the still to be born, and will not be still-born, Q cybercurrency, the Euro, the Yen, the Kiwi and other such major currencies]. 2.... Value of people per hour as measured in US$ [global people] The traditional CPI measure of inflation is confused by hedonism, hedonistics, hedonics and zero marginal cost software services, leaping and bounding cyberspace and such confounding variables. Money is primarily a measure of a person's time. The US$ is a global currency, so the value of a Standard Global Person is a better way to standardize US$ than a motley jumble of goods and services and abstract values. People are puzzled that there isn't inflation following vast printing of more US$. That's partly because there is a burgeoning global population bidding their time at lower prices to get some of those highly desirable US$. There are lots of other things happening too, such as Argentines [and me] having a little stash of the stuff instead of our local dodgy dosh. 3... Unreasonably low interest rates now so must go up. Uncle Al is well aware that the current incentive to earn and hold US$ needs to go up. 1% or 2% is not sufficient reward to people to accumulate US$ to earn interest at those rates. He will increase interest rates as soon as he can to avoid building up distorted expectations for too long in the borrowing crowds [who will dig in too deeply with risk of financial crunches when the increases happen]. Allowing irrational exuberance about the low cost of money would be as bad as the irrational exuberance in the telecosmic dramas. We have now had over two years of market clearing. So far, so good. Yes, there looks to be some more to go, but a very small proportion compared with what's already happened. I don't believe Uncle Al is in the slightest worried about the level of the Nasdaq, Dow and S&P500 - he just wants the markets to not be complicit in any structural financial hazards [such as was caused by the 1990s irrational exuberance which he tried to stem by raising interest rates to hefty levels]. So shareholders should not expect Uncle Al to be sensitive to their investment hopes. He is there to defend investment returns on US$, not on shares because that's the only way to maintain the US$ as the world's dominant currency. He will raise interest rates as soon as he thinks he can get away with it and if it causes some more crunching in stock markets, he will not be sympathetic, provided said crunches are of the order of 10% or 20%. The crunching will of course be in the companies with debts - Microsoft, QUALCOMM and cash holders with sound, expansionary businesses will go up. I have waited 6 years for this. As usual, it has taken 3 years longer than I expected for the hordes of people to get to where I thought they'd be back in 1999. As you often repeat, world reactions are a slow process; a relentless grind with a very gradually dawning of what the heck is really going on. Human reaction times are measured in years! I imagine that I'll be buying and borrowing to buy when Uncle Al starts increasing rates. Debt is a LOT of fun. My gains and losses would have been far less exciting without the added drama of leverage. Mqurice