SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (271005)7/7/2002 8:20:04 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
GOP Labels Al Gore a 'Scrooge'
By Judith Havemann
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 17, 1998; Page A04 1
washingtonpost.com

The Republican National Committee labeled Al Gore "Vice President Scrooge" yesterday for donating just $353 to charity last year on an income of $197,729 as conservatives tried to transform Gore's giving into a national political embarrassment.

In a circular sent to talk show hosts across the country, the Republicans pointed out that the vice president gave only about half as much to worthy causes as the average American earning but a fraction of his pay.

Gore gave away only a "miniscule [sic] .0017 percent of his income" the committee said, suggesting that for all the administration's talk of charitable responsibility, the vice president was not practicing what he preached.

According to Independent Sector, a nonpartisan group that studies philanthropy, the average U.S. family contributed $696, or 1.7 percent of its income, to charitable causes in 1995, the last year for which figures are available. Households with incomes above $100,000 a year contribute an average of $2,994, or 2.2 percent.

Gore's office said that the vice president had given "more than $85,000 over the last five years to charity" and that the Republicans were in no position to criticize after they "had tried to slash money for education, health care and the environment" during the same period.

But as columnists and talk radio hosts dubbed Gore "Cheap Al," it became clear that Gore, at least, was willing to do what few others weren't: disclose what he gave away.

Indeed, on Capitol Hill, spokesmen for both House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) would not reveal what their bosses donated to philanthropy last year, pointing a reporter instead to members' annual financial disclosure statements.

Those ethics filings, however, are designed only to reveal any potential conflicts of interest between a member's private holdings and public voting patterns. Many members of Congress donate speaking fees to charity – by law they cannot keep them – but otherwise the reports reveal little about a member's commitment to charity.

Gephardt "feels like it is one of the last domains of privacy that he and his wife would like to keep intact," said Sharon Daniels, a spokesman for the minority leader, who is widely considered a likely challenger to Gore for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2000.

Only a year ago, Gen. Colin L. Powell stood with President Clinton and Gore on a platform in Philadelphia to urge Americans to get more involved in helping the poor.

Asked about Powell's own philanthropy, his spokesman said Powell makes "significant contributions" to charity but is "not interested in divulging how much."

"Let's put this in perspective," said Col. Bill Smullen, his spokesman. "He gives every day. He is the chairman of an organization that reaches out to others to give philanthropically."

Former education secretary William J. Bennett, the author of books on moral values and head of Empower America, declined to make public his charitable contributions as well. "It would be unseemly," said the organization's executive director, Christian Pinkston.

Conservative columnist Arianna Huffington said Gore is setting a "really sad example" by giving so little when the need is so great. Huffington, the former wife of 1994 Senate candidate Michael Huffington and a crusader for increased giving, said she contributed 10 percent of her $420,000 income last year to charities that serve the poor and needy.

"Anybody that would like to see my tax returns can see them," she said. "There is a lot of hypocrisy out there."

Gore is not required to disclose his tax returns, but presidents and vice presidents have voluntarily made them public ever since Richard M. Nixon got in trouble for paying $792.81 in taxes on income of $268,777 during one year of his presidency.

Former vice president Dan Quayle, who may seek the Republican presidential nomination in the next election, could not be reached for comment on his current charitable giving, nor could two other likely Republican challengers, Malcolm S. "Steve" Forbes and Sen. John D. Ashcroft (Mo.). When he was vice president, Quayle disclosed charitable payments of $17,307, $2,934, $3,624, and $5,670, respectively in the four years he served in the Bush administration.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (271005)7/7/2002 8:21:23 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Gores' Charitable Giving Raises Some Eyebrows
cnn.com

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, April 15) -- In a 34-page 1997 federal tax return, Vice President Al Gore and wife Tipper reported giving $353 to charity, an amount much lower than donations the family has made in previous tax cycles.

That figure is less than one-tenth the typical contribution amount for someone with the Gores' adjusted gross income of $197,729. That fact has caused some bewilderment in philanthropic circles because of the vice president's "good guy" image as an advocate for public service and social causes, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday.

"I would assume that he would want to do something to demonstrate that he was being socially responsible through his giving ... " Stacy Palmer, managing editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, told the Times.

The vice president's office responded by urging that the Gores be judged by their history of giving, not just the dollar figure from one year's tax return. Aides also said some donations could not be claimed on the form, including church contributions and Mrs. Gore's donations of food and clothing to the homeless.

"Contributing financially to charitable organizations is certainly noble and should be encouraged and is something that the Gores have done when the resources were there," said Chris Lehane, a spokesman for the vice president. "However, to truly judge a person's commitment to helping others, you need to consider what they have done with their lives and how they have spent their time -- and by that standard the Gores are extraordinarily committed."

The giving pattern of the Gores has been erratic over the years. Last year they gave $35,530, most of which came from the proceeds of Mrs. Gore's book, "Picture This."

In 1992, aided by the royalties of Gore's book, "Earth In The Balance," the couple donated $52,558. Most of that -- $50,000 -- went to the University of Tennessee to endow a chair in memory of Gore's late sister.

During the years in between the Gores did not itemize their tax returns, and therefore no charitable donation statistics are available for that period.

But this year's $353 ranks very low by national standards. The Times reported that a survey by the pro-philanthropy Independent Sector shows the average American household gave $696 to charity in 1996.

IRS figures rank the Gores' 1997 level far below the average for households in their income bracket. Among households reporting income of $100,000 to $200,000 in 1995, the last year for which information is available, charitable contributions averaged $3,377.

But experts point out that a single household's donations vary greatly from year to year. And Gore's defenders also argue that despite the vice president's salary, he has two daughters enrolled at Harvard University and a son in a private secondary school.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (271005)7/7/2002 8:23:50 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Damn, sometimes my memory even surprises me! :)