Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: P. W. Herman who wrote (30457)	7/8/2002 12:30:47 AM
From: Sultan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 118717

<oT> Message 17703154

To: P. W. Herman who wrote (30457)	7/8/2002 2:51:57 AM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 118717

INSP delisting should have no impact on SI, it's not like INSP is doing secondaries or getting much Wall Street backing lately. They still have a ton of cash if they want to continue operating, $209m with relatively low quarterly cash burn. Their big "losses" are mostly depreciation and writeoffs. I won't leave until they pull the plug completely here. In that case, I will certainly keep my site up, I would post at Tom Hua's ATC site and probably check out IHUB. OTOH, if any new site tolerates abuse or Yahooligans, or they try to censor reasonable speech (the reason I dumped WallStreetStand in a few days), I won't stick around. Let's deal with what happens if and when it happens. Why would INSP keep SI going through the bear market if they didn't have a long-range plan?