Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (84399)	7/8/2002 3:38:26 AM
From: ptanner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

EP, re: "AMD has defined QH as performance relative to a Palomino(or is it TBird?)." TBird since it was first used for Palominos and still mostly used for Palominos since TBreds remain limited. But I agree with Joe that for practical purposes it should be considered as a P4 basis. -PT

To: Elmer who wrote (84399)	7/8/2002 4:02:12 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer Re..Nobody knows and AMD ain't saying because they'd rather rely on over zealous imaginations to define the term.<< I can see the Bees are really getting concerned about the QS ratings, and are trying to debunk them before Hammer hits. It really doesn't make much difference what the QS rating is modeled upon, (the old Tbird, or NW); as long as the Hammer performs as well as a hypothetical NW at 3400 ghz would. Let the consumers decide which model they want to compare to.